Landing forces at aircraft touchdownequations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tac_r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating landing forces for an aircraft structural component using fracture mechanics. The user seeks guidance on applying the FAA's effective weight equation for drop tests, which considers factors like free drop height, tire deflection, and wing lift ratio. Responses clarify that drop tests are standard for assessing landing gear shock absorption and emphasize the importance of airspeed and descent rate over total energy at touchdown. Additionally, it is noted that landing gear experiences horizontal loads during touchdown, including braking and lateral forces. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of accurately modeling landing forces in aircraft design.
tac_r
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

My first post here - I wonder if anyone can help?

I am attempting to apply fracture mechanics to an investigation of an aircraft structural component, and am having difficulty finding a suitable method of adequately calculating the total applied stress (hence 'landing forces...') in the component.

From what I have read, I was intending to use the equation for the 'effective weight' listed in the FAA's Federal Aviation Regulations, namely:

We = W [ h+(1-L)d / h+d ]

where:
We=the effective weight to be used in the drop test (lbs.);
h =specified free drop height (inches); h = 3.6( W/S )1/2
d =deflection under impact of the tire (at the approved inflation pressure) plus the vertical component of the axle travel relative to the drop mass (inches);
W=WM for main gear units (lbs), equal to the static weight on that unit with the airplane in the level attitude (with the nose wheel clear in the case of nose wheel type airplanes);
L= the ratio of the assumed wing lift to the airplane weight, but not more than 0.667.

Is this being too simplistic? Please forgive me if it is; I am a Licenced Aircaft Maintnenance Engineer, and some of this graduate stuff is pushing my boundaries..!

The situation being studied/analyised is the forces acting on the component mounting the main undercarriage legs in the wing of a tail-wheel configuration aircraft, landing in the level attitude, with the legs arranged at 78 degrees to the aircraft horizontal datum and 21.55 inches forward of the C of G (aircraft weight 1583lb). I have all of the airfoil date and lift coefficient so can work out that aspect.

I have seen another equation giving the Total Energy (E) (K.E and P.E.) at touchdown but am unsure again how this relates to the force I am Looking for.

Apologies again if this is all basic stuff, but I'm struggling to get a sensible answer..!

Many thanks in advance for any help you can give!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No, it's not too simplistic. Drop tests are a standard method for testing the shock absorbing capabilities of aircraft landing gear. The equations come from the fact that aircraft with higher wing loadings land faster and at a higher rate of descent. Drop tests are also much safer than trying to test landing gear by deliberately making hard landings.

Keep in mind that landing gear also has horizontal loads. There is a rearward force when the tires contact the runway, followed by braking forces. There are sideways forces when the aircraft is not perfectly aligned with the runway at touchdown.

The total energy at touchdown is not important, while the airspeed and rate of descent are important. The kinetic energy at touchdown is important when designing the brakes.

And, finally, here's a video of a too-hard landing: .
 
  • Informative
Likes anorlunda
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top