Laplace's Equation To Find Potential

baltimorebest
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a box that has a top and bottom at a/2 and –a/2, while the sides are located at –b/2 and +b/2. Also, the top and bottom are at potential V0=100V and the sides have V=0. You will need to use the separation of variables technique.

1) Find the general solution using standard methods.
2) Use the given boundary conditions to solve for the solution for this particular geometry.
3) Graph the potential as a function of x/b for y/a=1/2 as a function of y/a for
x/b=0. Also do it for x/b at y/a=0,1/4 and for y/a at x/b=1/2, 1.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I need help with the majority of this problem. My professor gave us the hint of using separation of variables, and she also gave us an example in the book to follow. However, I am still confused on how to do it. As far as the third part of this question, I don't really understand the question. Please help me, and thanks ahead of time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh ok. I will follow along and try to post when the other person does. Thanks.
 
I tried to work on this all afternoon and here is what I got for everything except the graphing. I have no idea if it's correct, but I really hope it's close.
 

Attachments

  • Scanned.jpg
    Scanned.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 532
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top