Lapse Rate and Ground Temperature Relationship in Constant Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheMathNoob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario where skin temperature and altitude remain constant, an increase in the lapse rate from 5.5˚C/km to 6.5˚C/km suggests that the ground temperature must decrease. This conclusion is based on the understanding that a higher lapse rate indicates a greater loss of heat with altitude. The relevant equation for lapse rate, defined as the negative change in temperature per unit of altitude, supports this reasoning. Therefore, if the skin loses heat more rapidly, the ground temperature must adjust downward to maintain equilibrium. The discussion concludes that the ground temperature decreases as the lapse rate increases.
TheMathNoob
Messages
189
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


If the skin temperature and altitude are constant, and the lapse rate increases from 5.5˚C/km to 6.5˚C/km, the ground temperature:

A) increases
B) decreases
C) remains unchanged
D) is never constant

Homework Equations


lapse rate=-dT/dh

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it would decrease because the only way to change the lapse rate without changing the skin altitude and skin temperature is by decreasing the ground temperature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your relevant equation seems to be for the lapse rate given by change in temp per unit of altitude.
All things equal, you are saying that in one case, your skin is losing 5.5˚C for each km gained in altitude, and in the second case, your skin is losing heat faster (6.5˚C for each km gained in altitude).
Thus, there must be something different in the second case which draws more heat from your skin, so I concur with your solution.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top