Large or small deflections of a cantilever beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the applicability of classical bending theory for cantilever beams under various loading conditions. It highlights that Euler-Bernoulli beam theory can be used when the beam length is at least ten times its depth, while Timoshenko beam theory is recommended for shorter beams. Additionally, small deflection theory is applicable if the beam's maximum bending deflection is also within a certain ratio to its length. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate beam theory to accurately model the first natural frequency of the beam. References for these parameters were requested to support the guidelines provided.
fmsrat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm looking for a parameter or a design guideline that could say weather or not the classical bending theory can be applied to certain beam under certain load. I'm making my dissertation about some work on cantilever beam and it's first natural frequency, so in order to model correctly the beam i would like to know if could use the classical bending theory.

Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
fmsrat:

From what I remember, using the classical beam theory (euler-bernoulli) does not account for shear strain which would over or under estimate your natural frequency. I feel that the beam theory you should be looking is Timoshenko.

Again, this from what I remember. Hopefully someone can correct me if I am wrong.

Best of luck.
 
fmsrat: (1) For a cantilever beam, you generally can use classical beam theory (Euler-Bernoulli beam theory) if beam length L ≥ 10*h, where h = beam cross-sectional depth.

(2) For a cantilever beam, if L < 10*h, you might want to use Timoshenko beam theory.

(3) For a cantilever beam, you generally can use beam small deflection theory (i.e., basic Euler-Bernoulli or Timoshenko beam theory, mentioned in items 1 and 2) if L ≥ 10*y, where y = beam maximum bending deflection.

(4) For a http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/9576/beam02.png or http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/3467/beam03.png (clamped, embedded, encased, encastre, built-in) beam, change each 10 to 20 in items 1, 2, and 3, above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply, could you tell me what references(articles,books) did you use for that parameters.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top