Laser Beam Destructive Interference

AI Thread Summary
When two lasers emit light 180 degrees out of phase in a vacuum, complete destructive interference can occur at specific points, but not throughout the entire space between them. If scattering occurs, a "shadow" may form from the convergence point back to the lasers, although the energy from the beams would likely convert to heat rather than disappear entirely. The interaction of the beams could potentially affect the gain medium of the opposing laser, especially if they are not mutually coherent. In a setup with a long coherence length, a standing wave pattern emerges, complicating the outcome as some light may re-enter the laser cavity and alter its characteristics. Overall, destructive interference does not stop wave propagation, which is a common misconception in these discussions.
GRB 080319B
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
If two lasers are pointed emitting end to emitting end in a vacuum (for lowest divergence), and emit 2 beams of light 180 out of phase, could both beams destructively interfere completely (no light coming from either emitting end after the beams converge)? If the experiment was done under conditions where some of the laser light could scatter, would a "shadow" propagate from the point of convergence to the emitting ends of the lasers (assuming the lasers are far enough apart where this can be reasonably detected)? Where would the energy of the beam go (heat?), assuming the lasers continue to function after the beams converge? Would beams travel into the emitting end of the the opposing laser and interfere with the gain medium?
 
Science news on Phys.org
If two beams are directed in opposite directions and have the same amplitude, in the gap between the lasers' ends will be a standing wave, like in a resonator. In this case the 180 degree phase shift can be established only for points in this gap, standing apart on a half wavelength. For other points it will change between 0 and 180. So, no destruction of the wave picture in the gap, but lasers may be destroyed.
 
Unless the two lasers were mutually coherent, no interference would occur. A simpler experiment is to use a laser with a very long coherence length, split the beam and create a ring cavity. In this case, there is a standing wave pattern. Even so, it's not clear what would happen- some of the light would re-enter the laser cavity and alter the lasing characteristics.
 
Right. Destructive interference does not imply that the waves cease to propagate.
This is important and a common misconception.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top