Last thing to be recorded near Black Hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astro.padma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
Astro.padma
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




An alien civilization has sent a small Spherical bot, made of Sterling Silver,
fitted with a light emitter and sensor as depicted below, towards a black hole
to explore the region around it. The bot moves slowly towards the black hole,
radially into it. The light source emits light in such a way that it
is tangential (at
the pt. of emission) to a circle with ‘centre of black hole’ as its
centre, and the
distance between the black hole and the centre of the bot as its radius. The
region around the black hole is free of dust or any other obstacle, and there
are no other light sources anywhere nearby which can be perceived by the
sensor.
Due to some malfunction, the sensor of the bot receives only those signals,
which fall onto it radially.
What will be the last thing that the sensor records before it perceives the
blackness of the black hole?
NOTE : The effect of gravity of any other bodies other than the black hole on
the bot is negligible

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



As light bends around the black hole, there would be two rays coming to the sensor , thus forming double image of the surrounding stars... as it could receive signals only in radial direction, is it a single image of the surrounding stars?


Am I moving in the right direction or going wrong somewhere?
Please come up with a different solution (if any)


Umm...Sorry if am asking silly questions but try to answer them as am really a beginner :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please clarify - the sensor and emitter are on the same bot, then the sensor receives light from the emitter directly, isn't it?
 
supratim1 said:
please clarify - the sensor and emitter are on the same bot, then the sensor receives light from the emitter directly, isn't it?

Um...Yeah you are right ! but... I don't think it is right :frown:

Can you think it in other way?
 
pranathi said:
Can you think it in other way?

What other way are you suggesting?
 
supratim1 said:
What other way are you suggesting?

Um...may be, ignoring what you have told in the 1st reply and going with some cocnept ??
 
sorry i am not getting any idea of what concept to use here.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Back
Top