Late Bloomers: Pursuing a Career in Physics After College

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a career in physics later in life is feasible, even for those with established careers in other fields, such as information systems. Individuals with prior degrees may not need to start from scratch in an undergraduate program but should expect to take several undergraduate physics courses to meet graduate program prerequisites. Many participants in the discussion shared their experiences of transitioning into physics, emphasizing that age should not be a barrier to education or career change. The challenges of graduate school in physics, including the rigorous coursework and financial implications, were highlighted, along with the importance of realistic self-assessment before committing to this path. The conversation also noted that pursuing knowledge for personal enrichment can be valuable, regardless of the outcome in terms of career advancement. Overall, the sentiment is that it is never too late to learn and explore new fields, provided one is prepared for the challenges ahead.
bikeaddict
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
im 41 w/BS and MS in Info Systems but I'm really interested in physics. Would I have to start over completely in an undergraduate program? Seems like there was a lot of fluff there that shouldn't have to be repeated (english, psych) Is it too late to start persuing a career in the field? Anyone other late bloomers out there want to share their experience?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, how much math and physics did you take as an undergrad? You'd probably just want to enroll in physics courses, without doing a formal degree. I suppose your goal is to get into a physics graduate program. I would assume if you take enough physics classes to prepare you, with excellent marks, you would get into a program somewhere. I don't think you need an extra couple of letters after your name, as long as you have the coursework each program requires for admission.

You are not too old unless you think you are.
 
right, a physics grad program, possibly a phd. i surely don't want to get a phd in Info systems. I've had enough of crunching numbers, building applications, etc. It's served me well in my career but if I learn more I want it to be in the area of math and physics.
 
I've met a lot of older guys in my engineering classes that work full time/part time/ or are retired from the military. Anything is possible.

Just remember this quote

Muhammad Ali said:
Champions aren't made in gyms. Champions are made from something they have deep inside them - a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have last-minute stamina, they have to be a little faster, they have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill.
 
I entered a physics doctoral program at the ripe old age of 38. Succeeded in getting the doctorate in a very impractical field (theoretical cosmology). Did 10 years as postdoc around the world. Failed to find a job after a detour into bioinformatics. Finally went back to writing engineering software at the same company I'd left so many years before because they had stuff like health benefits. Be careful what you wish for. But I wouldn't trade the detour for anything. Don't plan on making it a career, you are judged harshly as you approach 50.
 
And no, you don't have to start over again as an undergraduate. If you've got the background from a previous academic career (I was a graduate math major with substantial bling in stuff like quantum mechanics and differential geometry) they will just take you straight into grad school (at least in the US, beware your mileage may differ) without the social studies type stuff. Just try it.
 
bikeaddict said:
im 41 w/BS and MS in Info Systems but I'm really interested in physics. Would I have to start over completely in an undergraduate program? Seems like there was a lot of fluff there that shouldn't have to be repeated (english, psych) Is it too late to start persuing a career in the field? Anyone other late bloomers out there want to share their experience?

I'm 45, with degrees in computer science/engineering. After a year of taking a few upper division courses through a local "open university" program, I'll be starting work on an M.S. in physics next fall. After that... well, we'll see! :smile:

I doubt if you'd have to start over completely and get a bachelor's degree in physics, but you'll probably have to take at least a few undergrad physics courses as well...

Maybe it's just this particular school, but there seemed to be a lot of students looking for a second chance. Admittedly, most of them were much younger than I am, but I think that going back to school later in life is becoming increasingly common.
 
bikeaddict said:
right, a physics grad program, possibly a phd. i surely don't want to get a phd in Info systems. I've had enough of crunching numbers, building applications, etc. It's served me well in my career but if I learn more I want it to be in the area of math and physics.

Since you did not indicate which part of the world you are at, or if you intend to do this in a US institution or not, I'll assume that it is in the US.

Remember that you are expected to pass several requirements to get a Ph.D in physics. So not only should you have had several undergraduate physics knowledge, you almost must STILL be able to recall them, even after years of not using them. Most of us have a problem in doing that.

I wrote a short "test" on what someone with another degree can do to see if they have the potential of surviving, not just being accepted, in a physics graduate program. You may want to check it out.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=64966

Zz.
 
yeah what ZapperZ is true. I know a person with a PhD in physics, who hasnt used it for 30 years. So he has forgotten how to solve some basic physics problems.
 
  • #10
Thanks for all the encouragement and advice. I don't feel like it would be a lost cause. I'm thinking of it more as enrichment than a career. Enrichment for me by expanding my mind, for my kids by exposing them to science and a lifetime of learning, for the world if I can find something to add to the body of knowlege.
 
  • #11
cyrusabdollahi said:
I've met a lot of older guys in my engineering classes that work full time/part time/ or are retired from the military. Anything is possible.

Absolutely

Just remember this quote
That's one of the most beautiful (and correct) quotes i have ever read.
:approve:
marlon
 
  • #12
bikeaddict said:
Thanks for all the encouragement and advice. I don't feel like it would be a lost cause. I'm thinking of it more as enrichment than a career. Enrichment for me by expanding my mind, for my kids by exposing them to science and a lifetime of learning, for the world if I can find something to add to the body of knowlege.

While idealism like that is nice, you should also not divorce yourself from the reality of it. Going to graduate school in physics can be unbelievably challenging and EXPENSIVE. Many of us have questioned ourselves in why we would want to do this when we're up at 2:00 am in the morning trying to struggle through one of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics problem. And if you're paying your way through, it isn't cheap!

So unless you're willing to actually sit down and evaluate your chances of getting through, you could be in for a lot of wasted time, effort, and money with nothing to show at the end. I encourage a lot of people to study physics, but I also want them to face the hard reality that this isn't going to be a walk in the park.

Zz.
 
  • #13
ZapperZ said:
While idealism like that is nice, you should also not divorce yourself from the reality of it. Going to graduate school in physics can be unbelievably challenging and EXPENSIVE. Many of us have questioned ourselves in why we would want to do this when we're up at 2:00 am in the morning trying to struggle through one of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics problem. And if you're paying your way through, it isn't cheap!

So unless you're willing to actually sit down and evaluate your chances of getting through, you could be in for a lot of wasted time, effort, and money with nothing to show at the end. I encourage a lot of people to study physics, but I also want them to face the hard reality that this isn't going to be a walk in the park.

Zz.
it isn't a walk at the park even in the ug years, so i can only imagine how it is in g. (-:
 
  • #14
I only disagree with one small part of what ZapperZ said:

ZapperZ said:
So unless you're willing to actually sit down and evaluate your chances of getting through, you could be in for a lot of wasted time, effort, and money with nothing to show at the end.

I wouldn't really consider trying to learn something new a waste, even if you ultimately fail to get a degree or change careers.

I do agree that it is important to be realistic about what you can actually achieve, however.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go tilt at a few windmills...
 
  • #15
Look at the Open University www.open.ac.uk - it is a genuine UK university which does all it's courses by distance learning (and is very well respected in the UK at least ) - you can also do pre-degree preparation courses and get credit for exisitng experience.
I don't know what their rules are for people outside the UK but they may be a good source of courses even if you can't enroll with them.
 
  • #16
I knew a lady who recently died at 103. She was an unknown legal secretary at 65 when she retired.

The Governor of the State of Washington attended her memorial service and the State Senate and House wrote resolutions in her honor. A school is named after her and there is a yearly film festival named in her honor. Hmm, something happened between 65 and 103 wouldn't you say??

You are never too old until you are dead or too sick to work.
 
  • #17
zapper is right on, but on the other hand, we are all too old, so what?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top