Law of cosines being an immediate consequence of

  • Thread starter Thread starter SciSteve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the law of cosines from the identity (a+b)² = a² + b² + 2ab. The user struggles with the algebraic manipulation needed to connect the two equations and seeks hints to progress. A suggestion is made to approach the problem using vector representation, specifically treating the sides of the triangle as vectors and applying the scalar product. This method involves rewriting the identity in terms of vector multiplication to reveal the relationship to the law of cosines. The conversation highlights the challenge of transforming algebraic identities into geometric interpretations.
SciSteve
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with this question where I need to show the law of cosines (c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab*cos(angle) is an immediate consequence of the identity: (a+b)^2=a^2+b^2+2ab. I've played around with it for awhile and come somewhat close but can't get quite all the way there. It's basically all an algebraic problem but I'm not too good at that when deriving other equations. I drew a triangle with sides a,b, and c, to try to re-write the 2ab part as 2(c*cos(angle))^2 but don't know how to get rid of one to have 2abCos(angle). Any bit of help or just a hint could probably get me through this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the scalar product of two vectors?

\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b} = \rm{??}
 
yes i know when you multiply two vectors you get a scalar product, that comes into play with the cosine part?
 
Sure. Just treat that identity as a scalar product.
 
still can't come up with anything, it doesn't make sense since the identity is the same thing on both sides how can you transform it to the law of cosines? The question states to show how it's an immediate consequence so I would think its something fairly quick and not too exhaustive of a problem but I've been working on it for past 2 days and can't come up with an answer.
 
SciSteve said:
still can't come up with anything, it doesn't make sense since the identity is the same thing on both sides how can you transform it to the law of cosines?
If the identity were exactly the same on both sides it would be a tautology and of little interest.

My suggestion is to treat this as a vector problem. Draw the corresponding vector diagram (it will be your triangle):

\vec{c} = \vec{a} + \vec{b}

Now apply the identity to the right hand side, treating it as a problem in vector multiplication:

(\vec{a} + \vec{b})^2 = (\vec{a} + \vec{b})\cdot (\vec{a} + \vec{b})

See what happens.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top