Law of Ratios? derving a differential Fick Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of a differential Fick Equation from equations presented in the paper by Jaffe, M. B. titled "Partial Co2 Rebreathing Cardiac Output--Operating Principles of the Nico System." The participant questions the validity of the derivation and inquires about the "Law of Ratios." The derivation presented simplifies the relationship between variables A and B, confirming that C can be expressed as C = (A1 - A2) / (B1 - B2) under the condition that B1 ≠ B2. The mathematical soundness of the result is affirmed despite the initial confusion regarding algebraic laws.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with Fick's laws of diffusion
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of cardiac output measurement techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Fick's laws in detail
  • Study differential equations in the context of biological systems
  • Explore the mathematical derivation techniques used in physiological modeling
  • Examine the application of the Nico System in clinical settings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, biomedical engineers, researchers in physiology, and anyone involved in the analysis of cardiac output and diffusion processes.

sadsol
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to make sense how a mathematical derivation (equation 4) from equations 2 and 3. Basically it defies any algebraic law I know. The paper is cited below and the the equations are attached as picture.

Do you think this is a correct derivation?
Is there such a thing as "Law of Ratios"? If so can someone tell me what it is?

Thanks! Paper: Jaffe, M. B. "Partial Co2 Rebreathing Cardiac Output--Operating Principles of the Nico System." J Clin Monit Comput 15 6 (1999): 387-401. Print.
 

Attachments

  • FickEquation.jpg
    FickEquation.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 3,176
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never heard of the Law of Ratios, but the result is mathematically sound.

I'm going to simplify this by saying that [itex]C=\frac{A_{1}}{B_{1}}=\frac{A_{2}}{B_{2}}[/itex]. Then [itex]CB_{1}=A_{1}[/itex] and [itex]CB_{2}=A_{2}[/itex]. Subtracting the second equation from the first,
[itex]CB_{1}-CB_{2}=C(B_{1}-B_{2})=A_{1}-A_{2}[/itex], which means [itex]C=\frac{A_{1}-A_{2}}{B_{1}-B_{2}}[/itex].
 
Of course, we must have [itex]B_{1}\neq B_{2}[/itex]...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 233 ·
8
Replies
233
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
38K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K