Laws of Physics vs. Laws of Nature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between the laws of nature and the laws of physics, suggesting they can be considered synonymous, though neither term has a precise definition. Participants agree that new mathematical frameworks are often required to advance the understanding of physical phenomena. An example cited is Newton's development of the Calculus of Variations to solve the brachistochrone problem. This highlights the interplay between mathematics and physics in explaining natural laws. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the evolving nature of scientific understanding.
kgreen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm new to studying physics. Are the laws of nature and the laws of physics synonymous with each other? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, you can say they are if you want... it's not like either "laws of nature" or "laws of physics" is a technical term with a precise meaning.
 
That's what I thought. Thank you.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top