Laws Of Thermodynamics (Pre-university)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the First Law of Thermodynamics, which states that the internal energy (U) of a gas changes according to the equation U = Q - W, where Q is heat added and W is work done by the gas. Clarification is sought regarding "systematic motion," defined as the translation or rotation of the gas and its container, which limits the law's application to stationary systems. The Kelvin-Planck statement indicates that no heat engine can convert heat from a single temperature into work without losing some energy, emphasizing the necessity of cyclic processes to maintain overall entropy. The conversation also touches on the relationship between entropy and the second law of thermodynamics, asserting that total entropy in the universe tends to increase, preventing the complete conversion of heat into work. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the limitations and applications of thermodynamic laws.
saubhik
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Suppose, in a thermodynamic process, an amount Q of heat is given to the gas and an amount W of work is done by it. The total energy of the gas must increase by Q-W. As a result, the entire gas together with its container may start moving (systematic motion) or the internal energy (random motion of the molecules) of the gas may increase. If the energy doesn't appear as a systematic motion of the gas then this net energy Q-W must go in the form of its internal energy ( denoted by U ). Thus we get:
U = Q - W​
The above equation is the statement of the 1st Law of thermodynamics.


Now, I am not clear about the systematic motion part. First of all, what does 'systematic motion' really mean? I mean, what if energy appears as systematic motion ? does it not then follow 1st Law of Thermodynamics? Isn't The 1st Law true for every process in universe? (even though it is derived assuming gas-container system does not have any systematic motion!) Can anyone please clarify this? (thanks)

My 2nd question is : Is there any engine which does not work in cyclic process?
According to Kelvin-Planck Statement: "It is not possible to design a heat engine which works in a cyclic process and whose only result is to take heat from a body at a single temperature and convert it completely into mechanical work."
1.Why does this statement not hold for any non-cyclic process?
2.What is the exact meaning of the phrase "single temperature" in the statement?
3.Can anybody tell me why the Kelvin-Plank statement is true? (I mean is there any proof for 2nd Law or any physical explanation?)
4. Another form of the 2nd Law is " It is not possible to have a process in which entropy of an isolated system is decreased. " I am unable to relate this form with the Kelvin-Plank statement. Also can anyone explain why entropy cannot be decreased? (may be a foolish question but still can't find a satisfactory explanation!:frown:)


Any replies would be highly appreciated. Thank you!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi saubhik, welcome to PF!

saubhik said:
Now, I am not clear about the systematic motion part. First of all, what does 'systematic motion' really mean? I mean, what if energy appears as systematic motion ? does it not then follow 1st Law of Thermodynamics? Isn't The 1st Law true for every process in universe? (even though it is derived assuming gas-container system does not have any systematic motion!) Can anyone please clarify this? (thanks)

"Systematic motion" means that the container and the gas are translating and/or rotating. The First Law is generally applied to bodies at rest. In this sense, it isn't as broad as the law of energy conservation, which does apply to all processes in the universe.

saubhik said:
My 2nd question is : Is there any engine which does not work in cyclic process?
According to Kelvin-Planck Statement: "It is not possible to design a heat engine which works in a cyclic process and whose only result is to take heat from a body at a single temperature and convert it completely into mechanical work."
1.Why does this statement not hold for any non-cyclic process?
2.What is the exact meaning of the phrase "single temperature" in the statement?
3.Can anybody tell me why the Kelvin-Plank statement is true? (I mean is there any proof for 2nd Law or any physical explanation?)
4. Another form of the 2nd Law is " It is not possible to have a process in which entropy of an isolated system is decreased. " I am unable to relate this form with the Kelvin-Plank statement. Also can anyone explain why entropy cannot be decreased? (may be a foolish question but still can't find a satisfactory explanation!:frown:)


The reason cyclic processes come into play is that, most fundamentally, total entropy in the universe tends to increase. Also, heat transfer carries entropy, while (reversible) work doesn't. Therefore, you can't have a process that takes in heat (thermal energy), provides work, and returns to its starting position (i.e., completes a cycle), because it would consistently decrease the total entropy in the universe.

It's no problem to take in heat and convert the energy to produce work; you could do that by boiling water and using the steam pressure to push a piston. But that only works once; now the water has changed to steam. To get back to water (i.e., to complete the cycle), you have to condense the steam, which releases heat. Thus, you're not able to completely convert heat to work if you wish to run the cycle repeatedly.

Does this start to answer your questions?
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top