Least amount of time for motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the least amount of time for two blocks to move 5.0 meters without the top block sliding off the lower block, given specific coefficients of static and kinetic friction. The user derives the equation for time using the forces acting on the blocks and applies the conditions for static and kinetic friction to find the applied force. They calculate the time to be approximately 1.657 seconds but express uncertainty about the correctness of this answer, suggesting the possibility of an error in the textbook or oversight in their calculations. Other participants agree with the calculations but also question the validity of the book's answer. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying calculations in physics problems involving friction.
aaphys
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

: [/B]

The coefficient of static friction is 0.65 between two blocks. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force
Fvec.gif
(a pull applied to the top block) causes both blocks to cross a distance of 5.0 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

Let:
topBlock = m1
lowerBlock = m2

Given:
m1 = 4.0 kg
m2 = 3.0 kg
μs = 0.65
μk = 0.2
Δd = 5.0 m

Homework Equations

:[/B]
∑F = ma
Δd = (1/2)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution

:
[/B]
Starting with Δd = (0.5)at^2

a = [2Δd]/[t^2]

Now using ∑F = ma

ΣF = [m1+m2]*[a] = [m1+m2]*[2Δd]/[t^2]
ΣF = [2Δd*(m1+m2)]/t^2
t^2 = [2Δd*(m1+m2)]/[ΣF]

t^2 = [2*5*(4+3)]/[ΣF]
t^2 = [70]/[ΣF]

To find ΣF I said that the force applied must be one that is

m1gμs > F > (m1+m2)gμk → (4)*(9.8)*(0.65) > F > (4 + 3)*(9.8)*(0.2) → 25.48N > F > 13.72N

Then I use 25.48N and

t^2 = 70/25.48
t = √[70/25.48]
t= 1.657 s

And it's wrong :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculation looks correct to me. Maybe somebody else can spot a problem we missed, or maybe the answer in the book is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes aaphys
andrewkirk said:
Your calculation looks correct to me. Maybe somebody else can spot a problem we missed, or maybe the answer in the book is wrong.
I also got the same answer.
 
  • Like
Likes aaphys
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top