Left and right-handed Weyl spinors

  • Thread starter Thread starter goronx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinors Weyl
goronx
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new on this forum.

I have a doubt regarding helicity and Weyl spinors: I can't understand when I have to use left or right-handed Weyl spinors in order to describe particles or antiparticles.

What i have understood is that a charged current is described by left-handed Weyl fields: in this case a particle has helicity h=-1/2 and an antiparticle has h=+1/2.
On the contrary a neutral current is a mix of left-handed and right-handed Weyl fields, so that I can't say anything about particle's and antiparticle's helicity, isn'it?

I have also a kind of homework, but I'll post it in the appropriate section of the forum. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can try to be more explicit: my problem is that I don't understand how Weyl field can be used to describe particles and antiparticles and obtain information about their helicity.
Theoretically is it clear what a Weyl field is but I can't see how they are used in practice.
 
No one?
 
There is a discussion of this in Srednicki's text, I believe in the chapter about anomalies.
 
Thanks, it's seems to be useful for my purpose.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top