Length of a one-dimensional box with an electron inside

HuntMBryan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Another student was asking me about how to calculate L in a one-dimensional box, given that an electron with a wavelength of 418nm moves from energy-level n=2 to energy-level n=4.


Using, ΔE = Ef - Ei, I can say that ΔE = E4 - E2 = ((42 - 22) * h2 ) / (8mL2)

Rearranging for L is simple, but I was unsure on how to get ΔE. I used de Broglie to get speed and put that speed into KE = (1/2)mu2 and the teacher told me not to use that.

One of the lab teachers was telling me to use c = λv to get v and then use E = hv to calculate the energy that the electron absorbs to move from n2 to n4.

My question is why we are using E = hv. Why is light being associated with the electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HuntMBryan said:
Another student was asking me about how to calculate L in a one-dimensional box, given that an electron with a wavelength of 418nm moves from energy-level n=2 to energy-level n=4.


Using, ΔE = Ef - Ei, I can say that ΔE = E4 - E2 = ((42 - 22) * h2 ) / (8mL2)

Rearranging for L is simple, but I was unsure on how to get ΔE. I used de Broglie to get speed and put that speed into KE = (1/2)mu2 and the teacher told me not to use that.

One of the lab teachers was telling me to use c = λv to get v and then use E = hv to calculate the energy that the electron absorbs to move from n2 to n4.

My question is why we are using E = hv. Why is light being associated with the electron?

The question as stated in your original post is mis-phrased. The wavelength referenced in the problem is not the deBroglie wavelength of the electron as implied, but rather the wavelength of light absorbed by the electron in making a transition between the n=2 and n=4 levels. That is why you use the Planck equation to calculate the photon energy from the wavelength of light used.
 
Yeah, I was wondering about that. I'll go see if I can pull up the original problem. The wording was really really bad.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top