Length of curve in Polar coordinate system

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the length of a curve in the polar coordinate system, the correct formula involves integrating the expression s = ∫√((dr/dθ)² + r²)dθ, rather than simply ∫r(a)da. This formula accounts for both the change in radial position (dr) and the arc length due to the angular change (rdθ). The Pythagorean theorem is applied to derive the proper infinitesimal length segment (ds). In the specific case of a circle, where r is constant, the formula simplifies to s = ∫rdθ. Understanding these components is essential for accurate calculations in polar coordinates.
ltd5241
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I want to caculate length of curve in Polar coordinate system like this: if r=r(a)
then length of the curve is ∫r(a)da Is this right? if not ,why ?
What's the right one ?
I konw the way in rectangular coordinate system,I just want to do it in Polar coordinate system .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can think of it like an infinitesimal form of the Euclidean distance formula. For a function f(t)=\langle x_1(t),x_2(t),x_3(t),\ldots\rangle

\sum_a^b \sqrt { \Delta x_1^2 + \Delta x_2^2+\Delta x_3^2+\ldots } \longrightarrow s=\int_{a}^{b} \sqrt { dx_1^2 + dx_2^2+dx_3^2+\ldots} = \int_{a}^{b} \sqrt { \left(\frac{dx_1}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dx_2}{dt}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dx_3}{dt}\right)^2+\ldots}\text{ } dt
 
Is this ∫r(a)da wrong? Why?
 
You need to know what the appropriate infinitesemal length segments are!

Now, if you do polar coordinates, you may decompose a stretch of a curve into two parts:
1. The change in the radial position from the initial point on the curve to the final point.
Infinitesemally, this has length dr.

2. Here's the tricky part: The tiny arc by which the curve segment can be approximated by a circular arc, supported by a tiny angular change between the first point and the final point on the curve.
Clearly, that circular arc lies AT a radius of the value "r", and setting the angular change as d\theta[/tex], we get the expression rd\theta[/tex] for that length segment.<br /> <br /> 3. Now, we apply the Pythogorean theorem to these two length segment to gain the proper curve segment ds:<br /> ds=\sqrt{(dr)^{2}+(rd\theta)^{2}}<br /> <br /> 4. Assuming that the radial position of the point of the curve is describable as a function of the angular variable, we may rewrite this as:<br /> ds=\sqrt{(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^{2}+r^{2}}d\theta<br /> <br /> 5. This is then the proper infinitesemal form of the lengthn segment, and the length s of the curve can then be calculated as:<br /> s=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{1}}\sqrt{(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^{2}+r^{2}}d\theta<br /> <br /> 6. Note that in the case of a CIRCLE, where r is a constant function of the angle, this reduces to:<br /> s=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{1}}rd\theta<br /> as it should do.
 
Thank you ! Especially you,Arildno.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top