Combining Lenses and Mirrors: Finding the Focal Length and Image Formation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the focal length in a combination of lenses and mirrors, specifically questioning the use of a focal length of 15.0 cm instead of infinity for a plane mirror. It emphasizes the method of finding the first image formed by the front lens or mirror, which then serves as the object for subsequent optical elements. The process involves rays refracting through the lens, reflecting off the mirror, and refracting again through the lens to form a second image. It is noted that during the second refraction, the virtual image created by the mirror is treated as the object, leading to a negative object distance. The conversation seeks clarification on the correct approach to image formation in this optical setup.
stpmmaths
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=20476&stc=1&d=1252412682.jpg

Question B only

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



attachment.php?attachmentid=20477&stc=1&d=1252412682.jpg


1) Why we use f=15.0cm? Shouldn't it be f=infinity considering plane mirror have an infinity focal length?
2) Normally I do combination(lens, mirrors), firstly I will consider the front lens/mirror by finding the 1st image formed. Then the 1st image will be the object of the subsequent lens/mirror. Am I using the right method to do?
 

Attachments

  • Capture4.JPG
    Capture4.JPG
    37.5 KB · Views: 2,348
  • Capture2.JPG
    Capture2.JPG
    19.7 KB · Views: 2,377
Physics news on Phys.org
Any help from the web?
 
Rays from the object first refract through the lens, reflect from the mirror and then again refract though the lens to from I2. During the second refraction, the object is the vertual image I1 formed by the mirror. After refection from the mirror the rays appear to be converging at a distance equal to the distance of I1 behind the mirror. Hence u is negative.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top