Lenz's law for point charge in time varying magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
A point charge with mass m and charge +e enters a uniform magnetic field B, resulting in uniform circular motion with radius r = mv/qB. When the magnetic field varies over time (dB/dt = c > 0), the particle's radius decreases, leading to the question of whether it eventually comes to rest and if an induced emf occurs. The discussion raises concerns about the induced emf's behavior as the magnetic field changes, suggesting that the emf may decay as the flux area decreases. Conversely, if the magnetic field decreases (dB/dt = -c < 0), the radius increases, potentially increasing the emf in the opposite direction. The physics behind these changes remains unclear, despite the straightforward mathematical implications.
cfitzU2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello friends,

So I have a point charge with mass m and charge +e entering a uniform magnetic field B at velocity v from the "right". The field is perp to the velocity pointing "in", so I see that eventually this particle reaches a steady state of uniform circular motion (counter clockwise) with radius r = mv/qB

After this point, the field starts to vary in time at, say, dB/dt = c = const >0

I am unsure as to what exactly happens to the particle... here's what I think:

If my expression for the radius is correct, then the particle will eventually (in the limit) come to a rest, since B going up implies r going down.

What I'm particularly confused about is whether or not there is an induced emf in the mean time, due to the circle swept out by the particle... and if so, would it be correct to say that the magnitude of this emf is decaying in time as B goes up? I think this because the flux area is going to zero...

Similarly, if the variation is dB/dt=-c=const<0 then the radius grows... and so does the emf? Albeit flowing the opposite direction to the first case...

This seems weird and, while the math seems straightforward, I'm not so sure about the physics...

Thanks for any explanations!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does no response mean this is really easy or no one knows it?

Because I haven't been able to find a similar issue... :(
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top