- #1
Syrius
- 8
- 0
Cheers everybody,
I have a question regarding the Lie-Algebra of the SO(3,1), i.e. the Lorentz group. The generators are denoted by [itex] M_{\mu \nu} [/itex] with [itex] M_{\mu \nu} = - M_{\nu \mu} [/itex] and fulfill the following commutation relations
[itex] [M_{\mu \nu}, M_{\rho \sigma}] = g_{\mu \rho} M_{\nu \rho} + g_{\nu \sigma} M_{\mu \rho} - g_{\mu \sigma} M_{\nu \rho} - g_{\nu \rho} M_{\mu \sigma}[/itex],
where [itex] g_{\mu \nu} [/itex] are metric coefficients.
I can now construct from these generators the operators
[itex] \mathbf{J} = (M_{23},M_{31},M_{12}),\ \mathbf{K} = (M_{01},M_{02},M_{03})[/itex],
which fulfill the relations
[itex] [J_i,J_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,\ [K_i,K_j]= -i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,\ [J_i,K_j]=i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k [/itex].
In a final step, I define
[itex] \mathbf{J}^\prime = \frac{1}{2} ( \mathbf{J} + i \mathbf{K}),\ \mathbf{K}^\prime = \frac{1}{2} (\mathbf{J} - i \mathbf{K})[/itex]
with the commutation relations
[itex] [J_i^\prime,J_j^\prime] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k^\prime,\ [K_i^\prime,K_j^\prime]= i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k^\prime,\ [J_i^\prime, K_j^\prime]=0[/itex].
This means that I can construct generators that fulfill exactly the commutation relations of the Lie-Algebra of the SU(2). What does this mean for the group SO(3,1)? Can I deduce from this something like SU(2) x SU(2) is a representation of SO(3,1)?
Greetings, Syrius
I have a question regarding the Lie-Algebra of the SO(3,1), i.e. the Lorentz group. The generators are denoted by [itex] M_{\mu \nu} [/itex] with [itex] M_{\mu \nu} = - M_{\nu \mu} [/itex] and fulfill the following commutation relations
[itex] [M_{\mu \nu}, M_{\rho \sigma}] = g_{\mu \rho} M_{\nu \rho} + g_{\nu \sigma} M_{\mu \rho} - g_{\mu \sigma} M_{\nu \rho} - g_{\nu \rho} M_{\mu \sigma}[/itex],
where [itex] g_{\mu \nu} [/itex] are metric coefficients.
I can now construct from these generators the operators
[itex] \mathbf{J} = (M_{23},M_{31},M_{12}),\ \mathbf{K} = (M_{01},M_{02},M_{03})[/itex],
which fulfill the relations
[itex] [J_i,J_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,\ [K_i,K_j]= -i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,\ [J_i,K_j]=i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k [/itex].
In a final step, I define
[itex] \mathbf{J}^\prime = \frac{1}{2} ( \mathbf{J} + i \mathbf{K}),\ \mathbf{K}^\prime = \frac{1}{2} (\mathbf{J} - i \mathbf{K})[/itex]
with the commutation relations
[itex] [J_i^\prime,J_j^\prime] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k^\prime,\ [K_i^\prime,K_j^\prime]= i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k^\prime,\ [J_i^\prime, K_j^\prime]=0[/itex].
This means that I can construct generators that fulfill exactly the commutation relations of the Lie-Algebra of the SU(2). What does this mean for the group SO(3,1)? Can I deduce from this something like SU(2) x SU(2) is a representation of SO(3,1)?
Greetings, Syrius