Can Principal Bundles Help with Lie Group Decomposition?

Pond Dragon
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Long time reader, first time poster.

Originally, it was my contention that all Lie groups could be written as the semidirect product of a connected Lie group and a discrete Lie group. However, I no longer believe this is true.

The next best thing I could think of was to say that a Lie group is diffeomorphic to the (smooth) product manifold of a connected Lie group and a discrete one. This is proving to be difficult!

I'm a bit new to using general fiber bundles (I've only ever used vector bundles before!), but a friend of mine recommended me to use principal bundles. I've proven that ##\pi:G\to G/G_\mathrm{e}##, where ##G_\mathrm{e}## is the identity component of a Lie group ##G##, is a principal ##G_\mathrm{e}##-bundle. However, I really don't know what use this is to me.

Could someone explain how this is a step in the right direction?

Edit: Is there a particular way to get the LaTeX to render? It isn't working...
Edit2: In another post, display math works. What about inline...?
Edit3: Crisis averted.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly, I am an idiot.

To those who might come looking for this thread later: principal bundles are nice, but it is easier to simply note that the connected components of a Lie group are diffeomorphic. :redface:
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top