Lift relative velocity question.

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about a physics problem involving a lift accelerating upward, participants clarify the relationship between the lift's acceleration and gravitational acceleration when analyzing the motion of a ball thrown upward. The key equation derived is a + g = 2v/t, where 'a' is the lift's acceleration, 'g' is gravitational acceleration, 'v' is the ball's initial velocity relative to the lift, and 't' is the time until the ball returns. Confusion arises regarding whether to add or subtract these accelerations, with the resolution that both should be treated with the same sign convention. The informal explanation highlights that as the lift accelerates upward, it effectively increases the downward acceleration experienced by the ball. Understanding the sign conventions is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
takando12
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


From a lift moving upward with a uniform acceleration 'a', a man throws a ball vertically upward with a velocity v relative to the lift.The ball comes back to the man after a time 't' Show that a+g = 2v/t

Homework Equations


s=ut+1/2gt2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know this is a simple problem. By the substituting values 'v', 't' and a+g as acceleration in the above equation, i could get the answer. All of this is done by considering it from the lift's frame of reference. But I don't understand why we are adding g and a . SHouldn't we subtract them ? the ball goes up and down so must we subtract it the first time and add it the second? really confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
takando12 said:
I know this is a simple problem. By the substituting values 'v', 't' and a+g as acceleration in the above equation, i could get the answer. All of this is done by considering it from the lift's frame of reference. But I don't understand why we are adding g and a . SHouldn't we subtract them ? the ball goes up and down so must we subtract it the first time and add it the second? really confused.
Yes, if one is computing the relative acceleration of two objects, one should take the difference of the two accelerations. But... take a look at the sign conventions here. The lift's acceleration is positive upward. The ball's acceleration (from gravity) is positive downward. Yes, you have to subtract. But before you subtract, you have give the two values the same sign convention. That means you have to negate one or the other. g-(-a) = g+a. That's the formal way to look at it.

The informal way to look at it is that the faster the elevator accelerates upward toward the ball, the faster the ball seems to accelerate downward toward the elevator. So the upward acceleration of the elevator adds to the downward acceleration of gravity.
 
  • Like
Likes takando12
thank you...i forgot the signs completely. And the informal explanation tops it nicely.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top