Light if energy density of photons were constant

toughcanesrock
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At what rate would stars have to be producing light (how many photons per second per solar mass start) in order for the energy density of photons in the universe be constant? Assume current values of cosmological parameters. Do it for current time.

Homework Equations


e = c^2/(8*pi*G)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I understand that the photon density decreases linearly as time goes on. I am able to calculate the photon energy density for current time and parameters. But now how do I calculate the amount of light that needs to be produced for that number to be constant throughout all of time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer to your question but I'm pretty sure that the accelerating expansion of the universe means that it either already is, or at the very least will definitely become, impossible for the photon density to be constant. At some point, and whether or not it has already been reached or not I don't know, there just isn't any amount of photon production that can keep up with the accelerating expansion.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top