Light that has enough energy to cause this bond to break?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the longest wavelength of light that can break Cl2 bonds, the energy required is 242.7 kJ/mol, which needs to be converted to energy per molecule by dividing by Avogadro's number (6.02 x 10^23). This results in the energy needed for one bond to break. The wavelength can then be calculated using the formula λ = E × c/h, where E is the energy per photon, c is the speed of light, and h is Planck's constant. This calculation assumes no energy loss during the process. Understanding these steps is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
jewilki1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I really need help with this problem. I need to know how to work it and the answer. I am trying to review all these problems and they do not have answers.
2. It requires 242.7 kJ/mol to fragment Cl2 molecules into Cl atoms. What is the longest wavelength (in nanometers) of light that has enough energy to cause this bond to break?

Could you please explain this to me? I have the answer: 242.7 kJ/mol. Is this right?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the energy required to cause one bond to break you would have to divide the energy that is given for one mol of Cl_{2} molecules to fragment into Cl atoms by the number of Cl_{2} molecules in one mol. There are 6.02 \times 10^{23} Cl_{2} molecules in one mol.

Then when you've found this amount of energy you can find the photon wavelength required to produce it by using the equation:

\lambda = \frac {E \times c}{h}

Where \lambda is the longest wavelength required to fragment the molecules as the calculation assumes no energy is lost, E is the energy of the photon, c is the speed of light (about 3 \times 10^8) and h is Planck's constant (6.63 \times 10^{-34}).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top