Light Truck Skidding Distance at Different Speeds

  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Truck
AI Thread Summary
When a light truck traveling at 40 km/h skids 3 meters before stopping, the skidding distance at 80 km/h can be calculated using the relationship between speed and stopping distance. The discussion emphasizes that the stopping distance increases with the square of the speed, leading to the conclusion that if the speed doubles, the stopping distance quadruples. Therefore, the skidding distance at 80 km/h is determined to be 12 meters. Participants in the discussion highlight the importance of using the correct equations and understanding the proportionality of speed and distance in braking scenarios. The final consensus confirms that the truck will skid 12 meters at the higher speed.
VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0
When the driver applies the brakes of a light truck traveling at 40\,\frac{km}{hr}, it skids 3 m before stopping. How far will the truck skid if it is traveling 80\,\frac{km}{hr} when the brakes are applied?

Here is what I have done, we are supposed to use the work energy formula, but I can't figure out how to relate the small amount of information. There is no mass specified, no kinetic friction coeeficient specified? Please help!

V_{i_1}\,=\,40\,\frac{km}{hr}\,=\,11.11\,\frac{m}{s}

V_{f_1}\,=\,0

I figured t_1 using kinematics:

v_f\,=\,v_i\,+a\,t

0\,=\,11.1\,+\,a\,t

s\,=\,s_0\,+\,v_0\,t\,+\,\frac{1}{2}\,a\,t^2

6\,=\,0\,+\,22.2\,+\,a\,t^2

t_1\,=\,0.54\,s

a\,=\,-20.6\,\frac{m}{s^2}

Then I use these numbers in another kinematic equation for the 80 km/hr instance:

V_f\,=\,V_0\,+\,2\,a\,(s\,-\,s_0)

0\,=\,22.2\,\frac{m}{s}\,+2\,\left(-20.6\,\frac{m}{s^2}\right)\,(s\,-\,0)

s\,=\,0.538\,m

The answer is actually 12m though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
VinnyCee said:
When the driver applies the brakes of a light truck traveling at 40\,\frac{km}{hr}, it skids 3 m before stopping. How far will the truck skid if it is traveling 80\,\frac{km}{hr} when the brakes are applied?

Here is what I have done, we are supposed to use the work energy formula, but I can't figure out how to relate the small amount of information. There is no mass specified, no kinetic friction coeeficient specified? Please help!

V_{i_1}\,=\,40\,\frac{km}{hr}\,=\,11.11\,\frac{m}{s}

V_{f_1}\,=\,0

I figured t_1 using kinematics:

v_f\,=\,v_i\,+a\,t

0\,=\,11.1\,+\,a\,t

s\,=\,s_0\,+\,v_0\,t\,+\,\frac{1}{2}\,a\,t^2

6\,=\,0\,+\,22.2,+\,a\,t^2

If the distance it travels before stopping is 3 meters, taking s0 as 0 like you've done then then s should be 3 not 6 since the total displacement is only 3 meters. Also it may have been easier to use a different equation from the start, one that doesn't take into account time since you aren't given a stopping time, such as

vf2 - v02 = 2as
 
  • Like
Likes Angel_29
v_f^2\,-\,v_0^2\,=\,2\,a\,s

(0)^2\,-\,\left(22.2\,\frac{m}{s}\right)^2\,=\,2\,\left(-20.6\,\frac{m}{s^2}\right)\,s

-492.8\,\frac{m^2}{s^2}\,=\,-41.2\,\frac{m}{s^2}

s\,=\,\frac{-492.8\,\frac{m^2}{s^2}}{-41.2\,\frac{m}{s^2}}\,=\,11.96m

That is right if you round up! Thanks for the help.

NOTE: I think we were supposed to solve it using a work-energy formula (i.e. - \frac{1}{2}\,m\,v_0^2\,+\,\sum\,U\,=\,\frac{1}{2}\,m\,v_f^2) somehow.
 
Last edited:
VinnyCee said:
v_f^2\,-\,v_0^2\,=\,2\,a\,s

(0)^2\,-\,\left(22.2\,\frac{m}{s}\right)^2\,=\,2\,\left(-20.6\,\frac{m}{s^2}\right)\,s

-492.8\,\frac{m^2}{s^2}\,=\,-41.2\,\frac{m}{s^2}

s\,=\,\frac{-492.8\,\frac{m^2}{s^2}}{-41.2\,\frac{m}{s^2}}\,=\,11.96m

That is right if you round up! Thanks for the help.

Your welcome, I'm glad I could help.
 
Note that you don't need to actually find the deceleration to get to the answer. This can be done as follows,
v^2 = 2aS=>v^2\varpropto S
since acceleration is constant in both cases , we get
\frac{{v_1}^2}{{v_2}^2}=\frac{S_1}{S_2}
Now you can solve by inserting given values.
Do you follow ?
 
Last edited:
\frac{40\frac{km}{hr}}{80\frac{km}{hr}}\,=\,\frac{3\,m}{X}

X\,=\,6\,m

But it's really 12!
 
Last edited:
VinnyCee said:
{\color{red}\frac{40\frac{km}{hr}}{80\frac{km}{hr}}}\,=\,\frac{3\,m}{X}

X\,=\,6\,m

But it's really 12!
You forgot to square the velocities. Re calculate your value and you should obtain 12m.
 
Back
Top