Lighting a Banquet Table: Series vs. Parallel Circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the connection of six light bulbs in a hanging lamp over a banquet table, questioning whether they are wired in series or parallel. The consensus leans towards parallel wiring, as it ensures uniform brightness and allows each bulb to operate independently, preventing all lights from going out if one fails. The analogy of Christmas tree lights illustrates the drawbacks of series connections, where a single bulb's failure affects the entire circuit. However, the conversation acknowledges the lack of definitive information on the actual wiring setup. Overall, the importance of parallel circuits for consistent illumination in lighting setups is emphasized.
dmolson
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I know that this is going to sound like a stupid question, but I was wondering if someone could explain the reasoning behind this question.

A hanging lamp illuminates a banquet table using 6 light bulbs (120 V). How are the bulbs connected? Series or parallel?

Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that it would be parallel so that each light shines the same brightness, or they all receive the same amount of current, but I wasn't sure.
 
Most domestic incandescent bulbs are hooked up in parallel. Why would you not wan to hook them up in series?
 
The same reason XMAS tree lights aren't, if one goes out, they all do when hooked in series.
 
denverdoc said:
The same reason XMAS tree lights aren't, if one goes out, they all do when hooked in series.

Err, the question wasn't directed to you. I want to see how much understanding the OP has on this topic.
 
Sorry, didn't mean to kill a learning process. But this has got to be one of the dumber questions I've seen--not the fault of the OP's. As stated there is no answer. The first response tendered a possible reason, as in uniform illumination, but except for common sense assumption, we don't know how the lights were strung. They might have gone back and forth, criss crossed, etc. Maybe the host wanted an occasional excuse to grope the maid. Again, sorry if i stepped on anyones toes.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top