Limit and partial derivatives proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if all partial derivatives of a function \( f \) up to order \( n \) are zero at a point \( \vec{x} \) and \( f(x) = 0 \), then it follows that \(\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \dfrac{f(x + h)}{|h|^n} = 0\). The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the limit involving a general vector \( \vec{h} \) approaching the zero vector, rather than just a scalar \( h \). The proof relies on the relationship between the limit of the function and its derivatives, particularly leveraging the properties of directional derivatives and the gradient.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their significance
  • Familiarity with the concept of directional derivatives
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of limits involving partial derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the properties of directional derivatives and their applications
  • Explore the concept of Taylor series expansions for multivariable functions
  • Investigate the implications of higher-order derivatives in function analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in advanced calculus, mathematicians focusing on multivariable analysis, and anyone interested in the rigorous proof of limits and derivatives in higher dimensions.

cezarion
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that if all partial derivatives up to order n are zero at \vec{x} and f(x) = 0 then \displaystyle\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \dfrac{f(x + h)}{|h|^n} = 0

Homework Equations



\displaystyle\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \dfrac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{|h|} = 0
f(x) = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure if I should be doing this by induction. The first case is trivial. For the general case I am unable to move beyond either the limit \displaystyle\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \dfrac{0}{|h|^{k}}. I am also not sure how to formulate the equation for the k-th partial derivative. Is it permissible to use the same h for both a given derivative and the next derivative? Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you certain that the first case it "trivial"? Knowing that the partial derivatives are tells you that \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(\vec{x}+ h\vec{e_i})- f(\vec{x})}{h} = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(\vec{x}+h\vec{e_i})}{h}= 0 where h is a real number and \vec{e_i} is the unit vector in the ith coordinate direction. What you want to prove, \lim_{\vec{h}\rightarrow \vec{0}}\frac{f(\vec{x}+ \vec{h})}{|\vec{h}|^n}= 0 requires that h be a general vector going to the 0 vector. (It is, of course, very easy to prove one from the other. What is the derivative in direction \vec{h} in terms of the gradient or partial derivatives?)
 
Thank you for the reply. This was actually proved in our textbook, so I am just citing the result in the proof for this problem, leaving just the general case that needs to be proved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K