What is the Limit of the abc-Formula as a approaches 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter suyver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limit of the quadratic formula as 'a' approaches zero in the equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0. It highlights that while one root converges to -c/b, the other root diverges to negative infinity, depending on the sign of b. The confusion arises from manipulating the expression involving a zero denominator, which is valid only under certain conditions. The analysis concludes that both roots behave differently as 'a' approaches zero, emphasizing the importance of considering the sign of b in determining the limits. Ultimately, the limit exists but requires careful case analysis to understand the behavior of each root.
suyver
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
I was wondering something that is so simple that it baffled me...

When I have the equation
a x^2+b x+c=0
this obviously has the solutions
x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}

And when I have the equation
b x+c=0
this has the solution
x=\frac{-c}{b}

My problem now is the limiting case a\rightarrow 0 in the upper situation:
\lim_{a\rightarrow 0}\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\rightarrow -\infty\neq\frac{-c}{b}

So what's wrong here? Why does this limit not exist?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The limit does exist.

\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\cdot \frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}=
\frac{b^2-(b^2-4ac)}{2a(-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which goes to \frac{-c}{b} when a goes to zero. The same goes for the other square root.
 
Last edited:
But for the other root, I get:

\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\cdot \frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}=

\frac{b^2-(b^2-4ac)}{2a(-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which seems ok... but I don't think it is! After all, I multiply by

\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which is 0/0 in the case when a\rightarrow 0, and that's not allowed

So I don't think you can do this:

x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} \rightarrow \frac{2c}{-b\mp \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

Right?
 
Last edited:
One root goes to -c/b. The other root becomes infinite. Which is which depends on the sign of b, since the square root goes to |b| as a goes to 0.
 
OK, that makes sense. I had originally expected that both roots would converge to -c/b, but now that I think about it, it seems clear that the fact that b can be negative (so that I cannot just say \sqrt{b^2}=b) will spoil this. Oh well... too bad (for what I wanted).
 
suyver said:
After all, I multiply by

\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}

which is 0/0 in the case when a\rightarrow 0, and that's not allowed

Well, since \frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}
can only be zero when ac=0 this step is perfectly valid. We may assume a\neq 0 when calculating the limit. So that leaves c\neq 0 as a restriction. Although it would still be allowed when b is negative.

x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} \rightarrow \frac{2c}{-b\mp \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}
Right?

This expression is correct, but you have to take cases. If b is positive, then you'll find the expression with the negative sign to converge to \frac{-c}{b}, if b is negative the expression with the positive sign converges to \frac{-c}{b}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
66
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top