Limit of recurrently given sequence

  • Thread starter Thread starter twoflower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the limit of a recurrent sequence defined by a_n = √2 and a_{n+1} = √(2 + a_n). The user successfully proves the monotonicity of the sequence and seeks clarification on establishing its boundedness, suggesting it may not exceed 2. The limit is derived by setting A = √(2 + A), leading to the conclusion that A = 2. The reasoning behind the substitution is that as n approaches infinity, a_n and a_{n+1} become approximately equal, allowing the limit to be expressed in this way. The explanation concludes with a confirmation of the limit being 2.
twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I don't fully understand solving of limits when the sequence is given by some recurrent expression.

Eg. I have this sequence:

<br /> a_{n} = \sqrt{2} <br />

<br /> a_{n+1} = \sqrt{2 + a_{n}} <br />

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = ?<br />

First, I should prove the monotony and finiteness (is it ok to say it in english this way?). Well I did the proof the monotony by induction, I hope right. Now the finiteness. How should I do it? Can I just guess it won't get greater than. let's say 2 ? Ok, I chose 2 and prove that it is finite.

Now the limit. Our teacher wrote this:

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = A<br />

<br /> A = \sqrt{2 + A}<br />

And I ask, what should this mean? Where does this equality come from?

Of course to solve it is easy and we find out A = 2, which is the limit. But I don't understand why the equality.

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the limit exists then the difference between a[n+1] and a[n] for very, very large values of n is very, very small. In other words, a[n+1] is approximately a[n] for very large n. Hence the substitution. I don't find this very satisfying though. Maybe somebody else can provide a more rigoruous explanation.
 
I think it is like this:
Since <br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = A<br /> we can say that <br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n+1} = A_{2}<br />.
This gives <br /> A_{2}=\sqrt{(2+A)}<br /> and it´s obvious that <br /> \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_{n+1}<br /> and then we get <br /> A_{2}=A=\sqrt{2+A}<br /> and then we get A=2.
 
Yes. I think that's it! Very good.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
964
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
703
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top