Limit of recurrently given sequence

  • Thread starter Thread starter twoflower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the limit of a recurrent sequence defined by a_n = √2 and a_{n+1} = √(2 + a_n). The user successfully proves the monotonicity of the sequence and seeks clarification on establishing its boundedness, suggesting it may not exceed 2. The limit is derived by setting A = √(2 + A), leading to the conclusion that A = 2. The reasoning behind the substitution is that as n approaches infinity, a_n and a_{n+1} become approximately equal, allowing the limit to be expressed in this way. The explanation concludes with a confirmation of the limit being 2.
twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I don't fully understand solving of limits when the sequence is given by some recurrent expression.

Eg. I have this sequence:

<br /> a_{n} = \sqrt{2} <br />

<br /> a_{n+1} = \sqrt{2 + a_{n}} <br />

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = ?<br />

First, I should prove the monotony and finiteness (is it ok to say it in english this way?). Well I did the proof the monotony by induction, I hope right. Now the finiteness. How should I do it? Can I just guess it won't get greater than. let's say 2 ? Ok, I chose 2 and prove that it is finite.

Now the limit. Our teacher wrote this:

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = A<br />

<br /> A = \sqrt{2 + A}<br />

And I ask, what should this mean? Where does this equality come from?

Of course to solve it is easy and we find out A = 2, which is the limit. But I don't understand why the equality.

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the limit exists then the difference between a[n+1] and a[n] for very, very large values of n is very, very small. In other words, a[n+1] is approximately a[n] for very large n. Hence the substitution. I don't find this very satisfying though. Maybe somebody else can provide a more rigoruous explanation.
 
I think it is like this:
Since <br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = A<br /> we can say that <br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n+1} = A_{2}<br />.
This gives <br /> A_{2}=\sqrt{(2+A)}<br /> and it´s obvious that <br /> \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_{n+1}<br /> and then we get <br /> A_{2}=A=\sqrt{2+A}<br /> and then we get A=2.
 
Yes. I think that's it! Very good.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
982
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
764
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top