Limit problem with b^m*e^-(sb)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fleuryf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
fleuryf
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



show for m element of Natural numbers lim b->oo b^m/(e^(sb)) = 0



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I've started with so far but have ended up at a dead end. I just would like some help to point me in the right direction if possible. Thank you in advance


as b->oo b^m/(e^(sb)) yields the indeterminate form oo/oo.

both b^m and e^(sb) are differentiable near the limit

the derivative of the denominator is non zero so l'hopitals rule is applicable

However, when I apply lhopital's rule I get

lim b->oo mb^(m-1)/(se^(sb))

My approach was to prove this inductively, ie for m=1 and go from there but I can't even show this is true for m=1. Maybe this is completely the wrong approach. I have convinced myself that I am heading in the wrong direction.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think you're heading in the right dierection

after using L'hop's rule & differntiating you have a similar limit except with now ith b^m-1, ie. one lower power of b on numerator

what happens when you have reapeat L'hop's rule m times?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top