Limits of a function containing ln an raised to a power

dalterego
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


limit x --> infinity, (1+ [(ln2)/x])^x


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried raising the whole thing to e ln [function] so that the x power would get eliminated. What I've got right now is this:

e lim(x->infinity) ln([x+ln2]/2)^x
e lim(x->infinity) xln([x+ln2]/x)
e lim(x->infinity) lnx + ln2
e to the power infinity
= infinity

The limit is not infinity though its 2, I've done it several other ways, but it doesn't get me the right answer anytime.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure how you got to your third step. Since \lim_{x\to\infty}x\ln\left(1+\frac{\ln2}{x}\right) is indeterminate, your can rewrite it in the form
\lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{\ln\left(1+\frac{\ln2}{x}\right)}{\frac{1}{x}}
and then use L'Hopital's rule.
 
Ok when I use L'Hopital's rule it goes like:
ln([x+ln2]/x)/(1/x)

= (x/[x+ln2])/(-1/x^2) which simplifies to -x^3/(x+ln2)

= -3x^2

which is still infinity
 
You forgot about the chain rule.
 
Do you think that having a log in this is a problem? Would it be any easier if it were just \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} (1+ a/x)^x ? If so, ln(2) is just a number, let a= ln(2)!<br /> I seem to recall (check me on this!) that<br /> \lim{x\rightarrow\infty} (1+ 1/x)^x= e<br /> <br /> But that has no &quot;ln(2)&quot; or even &quot;a&quot; in it does it. No matter. If the problem is <br /> \lim{x\rightarrow\infty}(1+ a/x)^x<br /> let y= x/a. Then a/x= 1/y and x= ay<br /> (1+ a/x)^x= (1+ y)^{ay}<br /> and <br /> \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(1+ a/x)^x= \lim{y\rightarrow\infty(1+ 1/y)^{ay}<br /> = \left(\lim_{y\rightarrow\infty (1+ 1/y)^y\right)^a= e^a<br /> <br /> If a= ln(2) then the limit is e<sup>ln(2)</sup>. What is that?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top