Limits of Sequences: 8.4 |s_n||t_n| < \frac{\epsilon}{M}

[Artusartos]

In this link:

http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~johnsonb/Welcome_files/104/104hw3sum06.pdf

For number 8.4...

Why don't we just say...

|s_n||t_n| &lt; \frac{\epsilon}{M} M = \epsilon?

Thanks in advance

 

[HallsofIvy]

If you mean, choose N₀ such that if n> N₀ then |s_n|&lt; \frac{\epsilon}{M} rather than M+1, that would, give us |s_nt_n|= \epsilon, not "<" which is required for the definition of convergence.

 

[Artusartos]

If you mean, choose N₀ such that if n> N₀ then |s_n|&lt; \frac{\epsilon}{M} rather than M+1, that would, as you say, give us |s_nt_n|= \epsilon, not &quot;&lt;&quot; which is required for the definition of convergence.

<br /> <br /> No I didn&#039;t say that...<br /> <br /> I said |s_nt_n| &amp;lt; \frac{\epsilon}{M} M = \epsilon. So the first sign is an inequality.

 

[HallsofIvy]

Yes, you are right about what you said and I have edited my post to remove "as you said". But you are incorrect that it would be "<". You would have, instead, "=", as I said.

 

[Michael Redei]

Why don't we just say...

Probably because "we" didn't think that closely when "we" wrote that paper. If you ensure that $|s_n|<\frac\epsilon M$ what you actually get is
$$
|s_nt_n| = |s_n|\cdot|t_n| < \frac\epsilon M\cdot|t_n| \leq \frac\epsilon M\cdot M = \epsilon,
$$
which is what you have yourself.

If you look at that paper again, you'll see that the author writes
$$
\begin{eqnarray*}
|s_nt_n − 0| & = & |s_n| \cdot |t_n| \\
& < & \left|\frac\epsilon{M + 1}\right| \cdot |M| \\
& < & \epsilon.
\end{eqnarray*}
$$
Why did he suddenly need absolute values in the middle line? I think he probably didn't proofread what he'd written.

 

[Artusartos]

Probably because "we" didn't think that closely when "we" wrote that paper. If you ensure that $|s_n|<\frac\epsilon M$ what you actually get is
$$
|s_nt_n| = |s_n|\cdot|t_n| < \frac\epsilon M\cdot|t_n| \leq \frac\epsilon M\cdot M = \epsilon,
$$
which is what you have yourself.

If you look at that paper again, you'll see that the author writes
$$
\begin{eqnarray*}
|s_nt_n − 0| & = & |s_n| \cdot |t_n| \\
& < & \left|\frac\epsilon{M + 1}\right| \cdot |M| \\
& < & \epsilon.
\end{eqnarray*}
$$
Why did he suddenly need absolute values in the middle line? I think he probably didn't proofread what he'd written.

Thanks :)