Linear Algebra Book Recommendation for Visual-Spatial Learners?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for a visually-oriented linear algebra book, as the current textbook, "Elementary Linear Algebra" by Spence and Friedberg, does not meet the visual learning preferences of the user. Emphasis is placed on the importance of visualization in understanding complex concepts, with references to notable thinkers like Feynman and Einstein, who succeeded through conceptual understanding rather than rote memorization. The conversation highlights that visual-spatial learning can significantly enhance comprehension of mathematical concepts. Recommendations include exploring books on the mathematics of 3D graphics and specifically mentioning "Poole's Linear Algebra" as a highly visual resource. Overall, the consensus is that visual aids can facilitate deeper learning in linear algebra.
Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
Can someone please recommend a linear algebra book that will be more visual friendly. I like to understand the concepts visually and the book that my class is using doesn't fit me too well. I am using Elementary Linear Algebra by Spence and Friedberg.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not know any visual spatial books except the schuam's outline books, but even then you still have to do a little sketching of the art. I think I understand what you mean visualization is the key to learning and success.

Cheers, Tenshou.
 
Tenshou said:
I do not know any visual spatial books except the schuam's outline books, but even then you still have to do a little sketching of the art. I think I understand what you mean visualization is the key to learning and success.

Cheers, Tenshou.

Definitely, I believe that it can enhance high level learning/understanding of the material versus simply memorizing things in words -- especially for visual learners. Look at people such as Feynman and Einstein for example - they were able to make leaps and bounds because they weren't tied down by rote memorization, they had a big advantage due to their conceptual understanding. There are scientific papers that state that visual-spatial learning promotes conceptual understanding.

There is no clear cut line defining high-level understanding of the material, it is a bit relative. To me, high level understanding is being able to close your eyes and picture the mathematics coming to life in animation and knowing why the expressions are the way they are.

It takes a lot of time though, and the pace of a course can go by quite fast.
 
Books on the mathematics of 3D graphics use pictures/spacial interpretations heavily.
 
Poole's Linear Algebra, I love that book. I think it's very visual, check it out.
 
  • Like
Likes ibkev
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top