Linear Algebra: Determine Span of {(1, 0, 3), (2, 0, -1), (4, 0, 5), (2, 0, 6)}

Jake 7174
Messages
80
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Determine whether the set spans ℜ3. If the set does not span ℜ3 give a geometric description of the subspace it does span.

s = {(1, 0, 3), (2, 0, -1), (4, 0, 5), (2, 0, 6)}

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am having trouble with the second part of this problem (geometric shape). First off here is what I did to show that S does not span ℜ3.

First I define A, B, C, D as scalars and say;
A + 2B + 4C + 2D = X
0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = Y
3A - B + 5C + 6D = Z

I set up the augmented matrix

| 1 2 4 2 : X |
| 0 0 0 0 : Y |
| 3 -1 5 6 : Z |

rref (using ti89 titanium) ~
| 1 0 2 2 : 0 |
| 0 1 1 0 : 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 : 1 |

I can conclude from this result that S does not span ℜ3.

Now for the geometric shape.

I immediately see that the first and last vectors in the set are scalar multiples which means that they aer parallel.

Next I note that for all vectors y=0. My first thought is that the geometric shape is the plane formed by the x z axis to check I create a new set in ℜ2 on the xz plane

W = {(1, 3), (2, -1), (4, 5), (2, 6)}

Then repeat the above process to see is W spans xz plane

My augmented matrix becomes
| 1 2 4 2 : X |
| 3 -1 5 6 : Z |

rref (using ti89 titanium) ~

| 1 0 2 2 : (X + 2Z) / 7 |
| 0 1 1 0 : (3X - Z) / 7 |

From this I can say that W spans xz in ℜ2.

Is this correct? If not, where am I lacking in my understanding? My big hold up is the only example we have seen is a line. I am not convinced that this is not a line in space.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jake 7174 said:

Homework Statement



Determine whether the set spans ℜ3. If the set does not span ℜ3 give a geometric description of the subspace it does span.

s = {(1, 0, 3), (2, 0, -1), (4, 0, 5), (2, 0, 6)}

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am having trouble with the second part of this problem (geometric shape). First off here is what I did to show that S does not span ℜ3.

First I define A, B, C, D as scalars and say;
A + 2B + 4C + 2D = X
0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = Y
3A - B + 5C + 6D = Z
This is more work than you need to do. The fourth vector is a multiple of the first, so it suffices to check whether the first three vectors in your set are linearly independent.
Jake 7174 said:
I set up the augmented matrix

| 1 2 4 2 : X |
| 0 0 0 0 : Y |
| 3 -1 5 6 : Z |

rref (using ti89 titanium) ~
| 1 0 2 2 : 0 |
| 0 1 1 0 : 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 : 1 |
How did Z turn into 1?
Jake 7174 said:
I can conclude from this result that S does not span ℜ3.

Now for the geometric shape.

I immediately see that the first and last vectors in the set are scalar multiples which means that they aer parallel.

Next I note that for all vectors y=0. My first thought is that the geometric shape is the plane formed by the x z axis to check I create a new set in ℜ2 on the xz plane
The x-z plane is a subset of ##\mathbb{R}^3##, so the set of four vectors spans a plane in ##\mathbb{R}^3##.
Jake 7174 said:
W = {(1, 3), (2, -1), (4, 5), (2, 6)}

Then repeat the above process to see is W spans xz plane

My augmented matrix becomes
| 1 2 4 2 : X |
| 3 -1 5 6 : Z |

rref (using ti89 titanium) ~

| 1 0 2 2 : (X + 2Z) / 7 |
| 0 1 1 0 : (3X - Z) / 7 |

From this I can say that W spans xz in ℜ2.

Is this correct? If not, where am I lacking in my understanding? My big hold up is the only example we have seen is a line. I am not convinced that this is not a line in space.
Right. The vectors span a plane in space.
 
Mark44 said:
This is more work than you need to do. The fourth vector is a multiple of the first, so it suffices to check whether the first three vectors in your set are linearly independent.
How did Z turn into 1?
The x-z plane is a subset of ##\mathbb{R}^3##, so the set of four vectors spans a plane in ##\mathbb{R}^3##.

Right. The vectors span a plane in space.

Z turns to 1 because of the way a TI89 handles rref of an augmented matrix.

Thank you for your help.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top