Linear Algebra Homework Question

simplyderp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that A=[a,b;c,d]
is diagonalizable if -4bc < (a-d)^2
is not diagonalizale if -4bc > (a-d)^2

Homework Equations



For an nxn matrix, if there are n distinct eigenvalues then the matrix is diagonalizable.
For an nxn matrix, if there are n linearly independent eigenvetors then the matrix is diagonalizable.

The Attempt at a Solution



Characteristic equation for eigenvalues:
|λ-a,-b;-c,λ-d| = λ^2 + λ(a-d) + (ab - bc) = 0
λ = 0.5 * (d - a plus-or-minus sqrt((a-d)^2 - 4ad + 4bc))

For part 1, I need to show that there are two distinct solutions to this quadratic equation (b^2 - 4ac > 0: a,b,c from general quadratic eq - not from this problem)
I know that (a-d)^2 + 4bc > 0

However, I do not know how to show that (a-d)^2 - 4ad + 4bc > 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
simplyderp said:

Homework Statement



Prove that A=[a,b;c,d]
is diagonalizable if -4bc < (a-d)^2
is not diagonalizale if -4bc > (a-d)^2

Homework Equations



For an nxn matrix, if there are n distinct eigenvalues then the matrix is diagonalizable.
For an nxn matrix, if there are n linearly independent eigenvetors then the matrix is diagonalizable.

The Attempt at a Solution



Characteristic equation for eigenvalues:
|λ-a,-b;-c,λ-d| = λ^2 + λ(a-d) + (ab - bc) = 0
λ = 0.5 * (d - a plus-or-minus sqrt((a-d)^2 - 4ad + 4bc))

For part 1, I need to show that there are two distinct solutions to this quadratic equation (b^2 - 4ac > 0: a,b,c from general quadratic eq - not from this problem)
I know that (a-d)^2 + 4bc > 0

However, I do not know how to show that (a-d)^2 - 4ad + 4bc > 0
Expand the (a - d)2 term and then combine like terms. You're almost there!
 
You've got a minus sign wrong in your characteristic equation.
 
I had trouble with the same exact problem recently. Your process is correct. You just have a minus sign error.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top