Linear Algebra: Linearity of inner product

teddyayalew
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An inner product is linear in both components.

Homework Equations


<x,y> = <conjugate(y),conjugate(x)>
<x+y,z> = <x,z> +<y,z>


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was true . It is obvious that it is linear for the first component by definition
Attempt to show it is for second component:

<x,y+z> = <conjugate(y+z),conjugate(x)>
=<conjugate(y),conjugate(x)> + <conjugate(z),conjugate(x)>
= <x,y> + <x,y>


But the answer is false. I am having trouble understanding why it is not linear in both components. The answer key says that the second component is conjugate- linear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teddyayalew said:

Homework Statement


An inner product is linear in both components.

Homework Equations


<x,y> = <conjugate(y),conjugate(x)>
<x+y,z> = <x,z> +<y,z>


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was true . It is obvious that it is linear for the first component by definition
Attempt to show it is for second component:

<x,y+z> = <conjugate(y+z),conjugate(x)>
=<conjugate(y),conjugate(x)> + <conjugate(z),conjugate(x)>
= <x,y> + <x,y>


But the answer is false. I am having trouble understanding why it is not linear in both components. The answer key says that the second component is conjugate- linear.

What is the vector space you are working in? What is the relevant definition of inner product?

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't say which space. It was just a true or false statement, but I know that the entries of the vectors can be from the complex space. And it doesn't tell me which definition of the inner product but I believe it is the standard inner product.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
teddyayalew said:
It doesn't say which space. It was just a true or false statement, but I know that the entries of the vectors can be from the complex space. And it doesn't tell me which definition of the inner product but I believe it is the standard inner product.

In your OP YOU said "It is obvious that it is linear for the first component by definition", implying that you had some definition in mind--otherwise, why use the word 'definition'? So, are you now saying that is not true?

If we assume you are speaking of C^n with &lt;x,y&gt; = \sum_{i=1}^n \bar{x_i} y_i, it is definitely linear in both x and y. Your "equation"
&lt;\text{conjugate}(y),\text{conjugate}(x)&gt; = &lt;x,y&gt; is false, if by "conjugate" you mean "complex conjugate". It is not even true in one dimension, with &lt;x,y&gt; = \bar{y}x.

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top