Linear Algebra question concerning matrices

AI Thread Summary
If matrices A, B, and C satisfy AB=AC and A is non-zero, it does not necessarily imply that B=C. The associative property of matrix multiplication does not apply in this case, as the multiplication of matrices is not commutative and requires compatible dimensions. A counterexample is when C=0, which shows that B could still be non-zero while AB=0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of checking matrix dimensions and the implications of zero matrices in such equations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly analyzing matrix equations.
insertnamehere
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question about matrices.
If A,B,C are matrices such that AB=AC and A is not equal to zero, does it follow that B=C?
I looked at the associative laws that A(BC)=(AB)C=B(AC), and I think that B and C would be the same. Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd check that associative law again. The first two work, but because you can't multiply matrices together unless their ranks match up correctly, the B(AC) will not work for all cases.

For the AB=AC... you're on the right track. Try multiplying by a matrix and see if you can prove it for yourself. Another hint is below in white if you need it

You'll need to do something to A and premultiply[/color]
 
enigma said:
I'd check that associative law again. The first two work, but because you can't multiply matrices together unless their ranks match up correctly, the B(AC) will not work for all cases.

Of course you mean the numbers of rows and columns of the matrices are such that the multiplication B(AC) might not be defined even if A(BC) is. "Rank" is a bad word here as it has another meaning (I'm being picky, but thought it was worth clarifying).

Another problem with insertnamehere's associativity law is swapping the order of multiplication of matrices is not allowed in general (multiplication is not commutative).

As to AB=AC implying B=C, associativitity has nothing to do with it. Try considering the case when C=0. Then your proposition says "if A is nonzero and AB=0 then B is non zero". Is this always true? (it might help to think about 2x2 examples here)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top