[Linear Algebra] Showing equality via determinant properties

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two determinants without direct evaluation. The initial approach involves using row operations on the first determinant, specifically applying the operation -tR1 - R2 to simplify the second row. This leads to recognizing that the terms can be factored, allowing for the extraction of a coefficient related to (1-t^2). A key point raised is the necessity of adjusting the determinant by dividing by t when a row is multiplied by t to maintain equality. The conversation emphasizes the careful application of determinant properties and row operations to achieve the desired result.
CentreShifter
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Show, without evaluating directly, that
<br /> \left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1+b_1t&amp;a_2+b_2t&amp;a_3+b_3t \\<br /> a_1t+b_1&amp;a_2t+b_2&amp;a_3t+b_3 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br /> =<br /> (1-t^2)\left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1&amp;a_2&amp;a_3 \\<br /> b_1&amp;b_2&amp;b_3 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br />

Clearly, here I'm supposed to use the determinant properties, do some row ops on the first array, and end up with the RHS.

1. -tR1-R2 -> Row2 (no coefficient on determinant).

<br /> \left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1+b_1t&amp;a_2+b_2t&amp;a_3+b_3t \\<br /> b_1-b_1t^2&amp;b_2-b_2t^2&amp;b_3-b_3t^2 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br />

From here I can see that b_1-b_1t^2=b_1(1-t^2). But multiplying R2 by \frac{1}{1-t^2} means I have to also pull that out as a coefficient to the entire array. So now:
<br /> \frac{1}{1-t^2}<br /> \left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1+b_1t&amp;a_2+b_2t&amp;a_3+b_3t \\<br /> b_1&amp;b_2&amp;b_3 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br />

Another row op, R1 -> R1-tR2, and I have my RHS, except the coefficient is reciprocated. Am I doing this wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you multiply a row or column by some t, the value of the determinant becomes t times the original value. So you need to divide the whole determinant by t so as to keep it unchanged.

ehild
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top