Linear Algebra Textbook Comparison: Williamson and Trotter vs. Goode

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison between "Linear Algebra and Differential Equations" by Steven Goode and "Multivariable Mathematics" by Williamson and Trotter. The original poster lost the Goode book and is considering whether the Williamson and Trotter text is sufficient as a replacement. Participants note that Williamson and Trotter is a well-regarded classic in the field, suggesting it may be a suitable alternative. There is speculation that Goode's work could have been influenced by Williamson and Trotter, indicating a possible overlap in content quality and approach. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that the Williamson and Trotter book is an excellent resource, potentially making the replacement unnecessary.
sam90
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I lost my copy of Linear Algebra and Differential Equations by Steven Goode a couple days ago. However, I have a copy of Multivariable Mathematics by Williamson and Trotter. Is the book I have good enough that I don't need to replace the lost one? Does anyone have any experience with the two books and prefer one over the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not heard of Goode, but Williamson and Trotter is a famous classic. Of course since I am old, it could be that the other book is also a (more recent) classic and I just don't know about it. But the one you have is certainly excellent, and it is even possible that Goode modeled his on it.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top