Linear Approximation of (xy)/z at (-3,2,1)

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Find the linear approximation of (xy)/z at the point (-3,2,1)



The Attempt at a Solution


So the example my book gives has 2 variables so I'm struggling a bit with this, But I started off by taking the partial derivative with respect to each variable and solving for it.

d/dx = (y/z) = 2 = A
d/dy = (x/z) = -3 = B
d/dz = -(xy)/z^2 =6 = C

now... find the equation of a plane passing through that point maybe?

A(x-xo)+B(y-yo)+C(z-zo) = 0
2(x+3) - 3(y-2) + 6(z-1) = 0
2x+6 - 3y+6 +6z-6 = 0
2x-3y+6z+6=0

am I on the right track here..?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good try, but not quite. Here, you are NOT asked about the equation for some tangent plane, but how the linearized function Lf looks like, with f=xy/z

That is essentially to determine the first 4 terms of the Taylor series about (-3,2,1), that is:
Lf=f(-3,2,1)+\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}(x-(-3))+ \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}(y-2) + \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{z}}(z-3)
where the partial derivatives are evaluated at (-3,2,1)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
arildno: That last term should be ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(z-1)##. (You had (z-3) instead of (z-1)).
 
PsychonautQQ said:
now... find the equation of a plane passing through that point maybe?

A(x-xo)+B(y-yo)+C(z-zo) = 0
2(x+3) - 3(y-2) + 6(z-1) = 0
2x+6 - 3y+6 +6z-6 = 0
2x-3y+6z+6=0

am I on the right track here..?
Close, but no.

Look at the simpler problem finding a linear approximation to f(x) at some point x0. What you did is the equivalent of saying A=df/dx at x=x0, and thus A(x-x0) = 0. That's obviously *not* a linear approximation of f(x). What one needs to do is to replace that 0 on the right hand side with fapprox(x)-f(x0), yielding fapprox(x)=f(x0)+A(x-x0).

You need to do the same with your function of three variables.
 
D H said:
arildno: That last term should be ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(z-1)##. (You had (z-3) instead of (z-1)).

:frown:, :cry:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top