Linear Collision: Predicting Mass Motion

AI Thread Summary
It is possible to predict the subsequent motion of two point masses after a linear collision using their mass and velocity before the collision, assuming no energy is lost and the masses are equal. In a billiards context, this prediction holds true under ideal conditions. However, the challenge arises from the uncertainty of the energy status of the system post-collision. Accurate predictions require knowledge of energy conservation and the collision dynamics. Overall, while predictions can be made under specific assumptions, real-world factors may complicate the outcomes.
pakontam
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
it is possible to predict the subsequence motion of two point mass after a linear collision, given ONLY their mass and velocity before the collision?
thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about a billiards game. Would this be possible if your premise were true?
 
if you mean snooker, yes, it's possible to predict, based on the assumption that no energy is lost and the balls are of the same mass. (assume correct, is it?)
but u don't know the energy 'status' of the system after the collision, how do u predict?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
856
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top