Linear differential equations: source term constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the non-homogeneous linear differential equation q'' - qω^2 = C, where C is a constant. Participants confirm that standard techniques for non-homogeneous differential equations apply, involving both homogeneous and particular solutions. Differentiating the equation to simplify it is also suggested, but care must be taken to incorporate the original equation to determine any additional constants. The final solution structure involves exponential terms, with the need to reconcile the number of arbitrary constants in the context of the original equation. Ultimately, the approach emphasizes using both the homogeneous solution and the original equation to find a complete solution.
Morphheus
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the following differential equation for q(t) (position):

q''-qω^2 = C, where C is a time-independant value (basically a constant)

The Attempt at a Solution



This equation is not homogeneous, therefore it must be non-homogeneous.
However, in every definition of non-homogeneous differential equation I have found (textbooks and Internet), the source term (in this case, C) is labelled as dependent on time

So, do I apply the regular techniques to solve NH diff. equations? e.g. q(t) = qh(t) + qp(t) , where qh and qp are the homogeneous and particular solutions, respectively.

The only solution I may have would be to get rid of the constant by derivating both sides, and then solving q'''-q'w^2 = 0 instead, but I heavily doubt it's the right way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The constant function f(t)=C is still considered a function of time. You can apply the regular methods for finding the homogeneous and particular solutions.

You can also use your second approach of differentiating the entire equation and solving the resulting homogeneous equation, but you'll have to use the original equation to find the new arbitrary constant. This essentially amounts to solving the equation using the usual method.
 
vela said:
You can also use your second approach of differentiating the entire equation and solving the resulting homogeneous equation, but you'll have to use the original equation to find the new arbitrary constant.

I don't really get the "using the original equation" part.

To solve such an equation, I would guess that q(t) = Ae^αt, then solve for alpha (which would give me α = ±√(something), and would finally re-plug these alphas using the superposition principle in q(t)

My final answer would be: Be^αt + Ce^-αt
 
The equation q'''-ω2q'=0 has three roots, so you'll get three terms, each with an arbitrary constant. The solution to the original differential equation, however, should have only two arbitrary constants. To determine the third constant, you have to use the original differential equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top