Linear: Finding all scalars for given vector equation

Alexstre
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Vectors
u=(-2, 9, 6)
v=(-3, 2, 1)
w=(1, 7, 5)


Homework Equations


Show that there is no scalar (Cn) such that:
C1(u) + C2(v) + C3(w) = (0, 5, 4)

I'd also like to know where would I start to find all the scalars if there were any, since I'm pretty sure this problem will come eventually, and there's nothing in the textbook about it!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equate the two sides component by component. That's three equations in three unknowns. The first one is C1*(-2)+C2*(-3)+C3*1=0.
 
Dick said:
Equate the two sides component by component. That's three equations in three unknowns. The first one is C1*(-2)+C2*(-3)+C3*1=0.
Thanks! Here's what I tried:

1: C1(-2) + C2(-3) + C3(1) = 0
2: C1(9) + C2(2) + C3(7) = 5
3: C1(6) + C2(1) + C3(5) = 4

I've eliminated C2 and ended up with 2 new equations:

C1(-7) + C3(-3) = -3
C1(16) + C3(16) = 12

I guess from here I could solve for either C1 or C3, then go back to the original equations, plugging it in, and solving again (3 equations, with 2 unknown this time), is that right? Also, at what point will I reach the end (ie. when will it be clear that there's no solution)

Another thing, seeing how this is for a linear class, I was tempted to use matrices and start with the following:

[-3 4 6 | 2]
[ 1 0 -1 | 0]
[ 2 -8 -4 | 4]

Would that work? If so, should I try to solve for [1 0 0], [0 1 0], [0 0 1] system, and whenever I get to the point where I can do anything, I "proved" that this problem has no solution?

Thanks!
 
You are on the right track. Except I don't think the equations in C1 and C3 are right. Check that. Once you think you've got it right, try and eliminate, say C1. You should wind up with an inconsistent equation. Like 0=1. That would show there are no solutions. You can do the same thing with matrices as well. Though I don't see where you got that matrix from.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top