Linear transformation between bases

gothlev
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi !

I am a little bit confused with notation in the following:

Let A=

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4 \\<br /> 8 &amp; 5 &amp; 1 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}

and consider A as a linear transformation mapping \mathbb{R}^3 to \mathbb{R}^2. Find the matix representation of A with respect to the bases

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1\\<br /> 1\\<br /> 0\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} , \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0\\<br /> 1\\<br /> 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} , \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1\\<br /> 0\\<br /> 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} of \mathbb{R}^3 and

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 3\\<br /> 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} , \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2\\<br /> 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} of \mathbb{R}^2

It seems to be a lot of A´s in here with different meanings, and I suppose it is what confuses me :(. Anyway I solved it as follows:

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 3 &amp; 2\\<br /> 1 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix}^{-1} * \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4\\<br /> 8 &amp; 5 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} * \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 1\\<br /> \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}<br /> -21 &amp; -5 &amp; -12\\<br /> 34 &amp; 11 &amp; 21\\<br /> \end{bmatrix}
I am still not sure that I have not confused myself with all the different A´s :( Am I on the right track or completely lost ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are right but no guarantees. Just as a vector has different representations (components) in different bases, a matrix has different representations in different bases.
 
In general, to find the matrix representation of A, from U to V, with \{u_1, u_2, ..., u_n\} a basis for U and \{v_1, v_2, ..., v_m\} a basis for V:

Apply A to each of \{u_1, u_2, ..., u_n\} in turn and write the result as a linear combination of the \{v_1, v_2, ..., v_m\}. The coefficients form the columns of the matrix.

for example, here
u_1= \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}
so
Au_1= \begin{bmatrix}2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4 \\8 &amp; 5 &amp; 1 \\\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}5 \\ 13\end{bmatrix}

Now, [5, 13]= a[3, 1]+ b[2, 1] gives 3a+ 2b= 5 and a+ b= 13. Multiplying the second equation by 2, 2a+ 2b= 26 and, subtracting that from the first equation a= -21. -21+ b= 13 gives b= 34. The first column of the matrix you want is
\begin{bmatrix}-21 \\ 34\end{bmatrix}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thx for the replies. Thank you for a very clear and good explanation (HallsofIvy), the book I am reading is very compact and does not give very good explanations. There was a typo in the end of your reply:

\begin{bmatrix}-21 \\ 13\end{bmatrix}

should be

\begin{bmatrix}-21 \\ 34\end{bmatrix}
 
gothlev said:
Thx for the replies. Thank you for a very clear and good explanation (HallsofIvy), the book I am reading is very compact and does not give very good explanations. There was a typo in the end of your reply:

\begin{bmatrix}-21 \\ 13\end{bmatrix}

should be

\begin{bmatrix}-21 \\ 34\end{bmatrix}
Right! Thanks.

No, I'll go back and edit my post so I can claim I never made that silly mistake!
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top