Linear transformation exercise

knightmetal
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm given this linear transformation and I'm asked to do the typical calculations (kernel, image, dimensions, etc.) but there's one thing I'm not sure I understand, here's the exercise:

f(1,0,0)=(-1,-2,-3)
f(0,1,0)=(2,2,2)
f(0,0,1)=(0,1,2)

a) Is f invertible?
b)Find a basis of Ker(f) and a basis of Im(f)
c)Find eigenvalues, eigenvectors. is f diagonalizable?
d) Solve the system f^2(x)=0

Can anybody point me in the right direction on how to solve d) ?

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
knightmetal said:
Hello,

I'm given this linear transformation and I'm asked to do the typical calculations (kernel, image, dimensions, etc.) but there's one thing I'm not sure I understand, here's the exercise:

f(1,0,0)=(-1,-2,-3)
f(0,1,0)=(2,2,2)
f(0,0,1)=(0,1,2)

a) Is f invertible?
b)Find a basis of Ker(f) and a basis of Im(f)
c)Find eigenvalues, eigenvectors. is f diagonalizable?
d) Solve the system f^2(x)=0

Can anybody point me in the right direction on how to solve d) ?

Thanks a lot



Write \,\mathbf{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)\, , so that f^2(\mathbf{x})=f\left(f(x_1,x_2,x_3)\right)
But \,f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=f\left(x_1(1,0,0)+x_2(0,1,0)+x_3(0,0,1)\right)=x_1f(1,0,0)+x_2f(0,1,0)+x_3f(0,0,1)=\,

\,=(-x_1,-2x_1,-3_x1)+(2x_2,2x_2,2x_2)+(0,x_3,2x_3)=\,...etc.

Another, much easier way: write your lin. transf. as a matrix wrt the canonical basis:f\longrightarrow \left(\begin{array}{rrr}-1&-2&-3\\2&2&2\\0&1&2\end{array}\right) so that f(\mathbf{x})\longrightarrow \left(\begin{array}{rrr}-1&-2&-3\\2&2&2\\0&1&2\end{array}\right)\begin{pmatrix}x_1\\x_2\\x_3\end{pmatrix} and then f^2\longrightarrow \left(\begin{array}{rrr}-1&-2&-3\\2&2&2\\0&1&2\end{array}\right)^2

DonAntonio
 
Thank you for your reply DonAntonio, very helpful!
 
A minor correction. That looks like the transpose of the matrix that you want. The columns should be the respective images of the standard basis vectors.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top