Linear Transformations,Find basis of kernel and range

nehap.2491
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
suppose that vectors in R3 are denoted by 1*3 matrices, and define T:R4 to R3 by T9x,y,z,t)=(x-y+z+t,2x-2y+3z+4t,3x-3y+4z+5t).Find basis of kernel and range.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First you'll need to calculate what the kernel and image is of T.

For the kernel, you'll need to solve the following system

\left\{ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x-y+z+t = 0\\<br /> 2x-2y+3z+4t = 0\\<br /> 3x-3y+4z+5t = 0<br /> \end{array}\right.

For the image, you'll have to solve

\left\{ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x-y+z+t = \alpha\\<br /> 2x-2y+3z+4t = \beta\\<br /> 3x-3y+4z+5t = \gamma<br /> \end{array}\right.

where alpha, beta, gamma are parameters. You'll then have to see for which alpha, beta, gamma this system has a solution.
 
Ow, for the image you won't need to do all that stuff, I'm sorry.

You'll first have to find a basis of R4, call this {e1,e2,e3,e4}. Then {T(e1),T(e2),T(e3),T(e4)} is a set which spans the image. If this set is linear independant, then it's a basis. If not, then remove some vectors until it is linear independant...
 
If you are open to it, the equation below (in case f : V -> W) might even help:

dim(ker(f)) + dim(Im(f)) = dim(V)
 
micromass said:
Ow, for the image you won't need to do all that stuff, I'm sorry.

You'll first have to find a basis of R4, call this {e1,e2,e3,e4}. Then {T(e1),T(e2),T(e3),T(e4)} is a set which spans the image. If this set is linear independant, then it's a basis. If not, then remove some vectors until it is linear independant...
Thank you!
 
Outlined said:
If you are open to it, the equation below (in case f : V -> W) might even help:

dim(ker(f)) + dim(Im(f)) = dim(V)
Thank you!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top