Linearization and energy equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving a body falling in water, where the upward force is modeled as bv^2. The linearization of the equation at terminal speed leads to a new expression for ve, which is derived as ve = sqrt(mg/2b). The user seeks to apply the conservation of energy approach instead of the F = ma method to verify their solution but struggles with integrating the work done by the linearized force. They express confusion about how to correctly incorporate the work term into the energy equation. The user also speculates that their question might be better suited for an engineering-focused forum due to the nature of linearization.
tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.

We were given a problem, which was to consider bv^2 as the force acting upwards on a body falling in water. We were asked to find the depth at which a body entering the water at 5 * ve (terminal speed) would end up with a speed of 1.1 * ve.

Starting from -bv^2 + mg = ma, the first step is to linearize the non-linear expression bv^2 at the equilibrium point (ma = 0).

The equation at the chosen equilibrium point becomes b(ve)^2 = mg

The linearization gives:

b(ve)^2 + 2b(ve)(Δv).Substitution into the original equation gives -b(ve)^2 - 2b(ve)(Δv) + mg = ma.

We know that at the chosen equilibrium point, b(ve)^2 = mg. Thus, mg - b(ve)^2 = 0. I can remove these 2 expressions in the above equation to get the linearized equation at the equilibrium point ve:

Linearized upward force at terminal speed = 2b(ve)(Δv) = ma

Also our teacher showed us that the 2b(ve) expression must be used to find the value of the linearized ve point. Thus, using the equilibrium equation above but substituting b(ve)^2 by the new constant coefficient 2b(ve) which multiplies ve, we get 2b(ve)*ve = mg -> ve = sqrt(mg/2b)

Given the above equation in bold, I was able to solve for height h by using the following substitution:

a = v * dv / dh

Using this substitution I could integrate on both sides of the above equation and solve for h pretty easily. I confirmed with my teacher that our answer was correct.

Here's my question:

I would like to solve this problem by using the conservation of energy equation instead of solving the F = ma equation. Before my teacher confirmed that we had the right answer, I wanted to solve the problem using this other method because I could've verified my answer by myself. However, I don't know how to solve this. I put the initial energy + the work on the left hand side, and the final energy on the right hand side.

Assuming the object falls into the water at a height h at an initial speed of 5ve,

V1 = mgh
T1 = m/2 * (5ve)^2
Work = 2b(ve)(Δv) * h

V2 = 0
T2 = m/2 * (1.1ve)^2

V1 + T1 - Work = V2 + T2

I don't know what to do with the expression in bold, for the work of the linearized force. Obviously an integral is needed, but if I integrate as I specified above, I have to divide both sides by Δv since dv is on the right side of the equation. I end up with 2b(ve)h = stuff. The left side of this equation is NOT equal to the Force times acceleration because the force has a Δv on the left side.

So, how can I find the "correct" work to put into the equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I understand linearisation is mostly used in engineering, since real-life systems must use these approximations. I'm going to assume this is why physicists aren't really comfortable answering my question. Does anyone know a forum that could be better suited for this engineering question?

Thanks again.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top