Lines of action of forces and net torque

AI Thread Summary
When three forces act on a body and their lines of action pass through a common point, the net torque about that point is zero because the distance from the point to the line of action of each force is zero. Torque is calculated as the product of force and distance, and since the distance is zero, the torque produced by each force is also zero. This principle applies even if only one force is present, as it will not create torque about the point it acts upon. The discussion emphasizes that taking moments about points where forces act simplifies analysis by eliminating torque calculations. Understanding this concept is crucial for solving problems involving forces and torques in physics.
makeAwish
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
I have a question.

For example there are three forces of diff magnitudes and are in three diff directions (not oppo directions) acting on a body. if the lines of action of the 3 forces pass through a common point, why the net torque abt that pt is zero?

Can someone help me pls?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
k I am not sure what u asking but , u could add up all the x and y components
of the vectors and get the resultant vector.
 
Erm. What i want to ask is just this:

Why when the lines of action of 3 forces pass through a common point, the net torque abt that common point is zero?
 
I think I understand your question. Suppose we have we have a rod x units long, centered at x = 0. Suppose there is a force +F at +x/2 and a force -F at -x/2. There is no net force on the rod, but there is a torque about the point x=0. However, if the two opposing forces were both applied at x=0, then there is no torque about the point x=0. Even if the two opposing forces were applied at x=0 but not equal, there still is no torque about the point x=0. Is this your question?.
 
Hi makeAwish! :smile:
makeAwish said:
if the lines of action of the 3 forces pass through a common point, why the net torque abt that pt is zero?

It even works for just one force …

the net torque must be zero about any point if the force goes through that point …

torque (or moment) = force x distance, and distance = 0. :smile:

(btw, this is why we always take moments about hinges etc, because we want to simplify the problem by leaving out the force at that point :wink:)
 
oh ya... each force produces zero torque cos r is 0, so the sum of it at that point is still zero..

haha. thanks a lot! :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top