Linus Pauling's "General Chemistry" Book- Is it Up to Date?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennington
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
Linus Pauling's "General Chemistry" is discussed as a potential resource for understanding chemical processes, though concerns about its publication date and relevance are raised. Some users express mixed experiences with the book; while one found it excellent after prior chemistry education, another's spouse struggled with its lack of explanations. Despite its age, it's noted that general chemistry hasn't changed significantly since its release, though advancements in quantum chemistry and nanotechnology are acknowledged as gaps. Recommendations for modern alternatives include "Chemistry: The Central Science" by Brown et al. and "Principles of Chemistry" by Munowitz, with the latter praised for its clarity. Overall, while Pauling's book may not be sufficient as a sole resource, it is suggested as a valuable read alongside other modern texts, especially given its low cost.
bennington
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I was in Barnes and Noble and few weeks ago searching through the science section, and I found a small book by Linus Pauling called General Chemistry. Alhtough it does not look like a normal textbook, it is supposed to contain all of the information that an undergrad needs to understand chemistry. I would like to purchase this to understand more about chemical processes, but I am concerned about the date that this was published. Do any of you own the book, and if you do, is it up to date? Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This is only my opinion, so listen to others also.

I read Pauling's chemical bond book after taking general chemistry and organic chemistry. I loved it but probably could not have understood it before taking those courses.

My wife took general chemistry with Pauling's textbook (in the 60s) and absolutely hated the book. She found it incomprehensible; there simply was not enough explanation. I don't know if later editions added any more explanations.
 
The thing is that I saw a lot of positive reviews of it on Amazon, so I am now really uncertain. How about a book I found through PF - General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications by Ralph H. Petrucci, William S. Harwood, and Geoffrey Herring?
 
Sorry, I don't know any of the modern chemistry texts.
 
TVP45 said:
Sorry, I don't know any of the modern chemistry texts.

still, thanks for helping me.
 
bennington said:
I was in Barnes and Noble and few weeks ago searching through the science section, and I found a small book by Linus Pauling called General Chemistry. Alhtough it does not look like a normal textbook, it is supposed to contain all of the information that an undergrad needs to understand chemistry. I would like to purchase this to understand more about chemical processes, but I am concerned about the date that this was published. Do any of you own the book, and if you do, is it up to date? Thanks.

I bought his book on Quantum Mechanics about a year ago. It was quite old also. I find it interesting that B&N would stock such a book. Usually you have to go to used bookstores for such items.
 
Linus Pauling's book is excellent. It is the best gen chem book I know, but I think it is better after having had some education in the ideas of chemistry already.

Brown et al's Chemistry: The Central Science is a great modern General Chemistry text. However, I think Munowitz's Principles of Chemistry is best. This is also new, but it isn't formatted in the same style as most texts. Munowitz explicitly states the things most gen. chem. books only say implicitly, which I would think would make it a great book to start with.

General Chemistry hasn't changed a ton since Pauling's book came out. The biggest deficit is probably in quantum chemistry. Nanotechnology and new allotropes of carbon (nanotubes, fullerenes) have come about since the book was published too. I guess having an intro to quantum chemistry before a pchem class is pretty important, so I would say Pauling's book is not completely sufficient. But I still think that anyone interested in chemistry should read Pauling's book at some point.
 
Last edited:
Someone once said "Read the masters, not their pupils". This is sometimes true. Not always. I remember Fermi's book on thermodynamics as totally uninspired and no different from other ornery books on the subject. Though maybe these copied it. Dirac's books look like they could only be read by someone who doesn't need to.

But there are some examples on the other side. That give you the insight, the underlying spirit, motivation and even simplicity of things.

Read the reviews at Amazon. It sounds like it should not be the only Chemistry book you ever read, unless you only ever read one, but that it will help you a lot to read the others you need. At starting $6.50 used and $13 new and could sell on you are not risking that much.
 
Back
Top