Lipschitz condition, more of like a clarification

  • Thread starter Thread starter relinquished™
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Lipschitz
relinquished™
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I just have one question that's been bothering me. When I reduce a higher ODE to a First ODE, and if I prove that First ODE satisfies the Lipschitz condition, does that mean that the higher ODE has a unique solution (thanks to some other theorem)?

All clarifications are appreciated,

Reli~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The point is that the higher order de is equivalent to the first order de. You can convert any solution of the first order de to a unique solution of the higher order de. If the solution to the first order de problem is unique then so is the solution to the higher order de.
 
Thanks for the clarification Halls. Things are a bit clearer now. :)

Reli~
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top