Liquid molecular Velocity Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the applicability of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution to liquids, noting its effectiveness for gases but highlighting the complexities introduced by intermolecular forces in liquids. It is acknowledged that the Maxwell distribution is less accurate for liquids due to these interactions, with alternative approaches like pair distribution functions being suggested to describe liquid structure. A reference from a 1946 publication by M. Born and H.S. Green proposes a modified molecular velocity distribution for liquids, though it is noted to be less precise than the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution for gases. The conversation indicates a lack of extensive research on calculating liquid interactions, particularly for substances like water, benzene, and toluene. Overall, the challenges of adapting kinetic theory to liquids remain a significant topic of inquiry.
AdamPhysics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does Maxwell Boltzmann hold for liquids? In the case of gases it does quite well for calculating the velocity distribution given a temperature. However, when the molecules are closer together in the case of liquids, how do the van der waals force and others effect the velocity distribution.

What are the limitations on the maxwell distribution? What can be done for the case of liquid water? liquid benzene, toluene?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Maxwell distribution holds for non-interacting particles, like a gas. As you point out, there are intermolecular forces in liquids (and solids). I don't know how much progress has been made. I suspect more work has been done on weakly interacting molecules- which is not water. What I have seen in liquids are things like "pair distribution functions" to describe the structure of a liquid, but nothing intuitive or satisfying.
 
Thanks, for the help. I have done an extensive search and nothing seems to be out there on calculating the liquid interactions.

Found this publication from 1946

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a mathematical and Physical Character
Vol. 188
Issue 1012
December 1946
Pages 10-18

Author: M. Born and H.S. Green
Title: A General Kinetic Theory of Liquids. 1. The Molecular Distribution Functions
 
The molecular velocity distribution for a liquid should be (roughly) approximated by m^3v^5/(kT)^3 * EXP [-mv^2/kT]

The energy distribution is a lot "prettier" optically:
4E^2/(kT)^3 * EXP [-2E/kT]

Not sure if it satisfies your needs or not. This is not as accurate as the m-b distribution is for gases.
 
FireBones said:
The energy distribution is a lot "prettier" optically:
4E^2/(kT)^3 * EXP [-2E/kT]

Oops, when I translated into energy I made an error...and after rectifying it, it no longer looked particularly clean...so just ignore that half.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top