List the solids in order of increasing polarity.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on ranking the solids NaCl, C10H8, C6H5COOH, and NH2CONH2 by increasing polarity. The proposed order is C10H8, C6H5COOH, NH2CONH2, and NaCl, based on the idea that longer carbon chains tend to be less polar. It emphasizes the importance of molecular geometry in determining polarity. Calculating the dipole moment using an electronegativity chart is suggested for a more accurate assessment. Understanding the structure of each molecule is crucial for determining their relative polarities.
Ki-nana18
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


List the solids in order of increasing polarity.
NaCl,C10H8, C6H5COOH, NH2CONH2.

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution



C10H8, C6H5COOH, NH2CONH2, NaCl. My rationale is that the longer the carbon skeleton the least polar.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It really depends on the molecular geometry. You should figure out the structure of the molecule and then calculate the dipole moment by referencing an electronegativity chart for specific numbers. That should get you a good idea of the polarity.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top